ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023
Cardiology in a Digital Age: Opportunities and Challenges for e-Health: A Literature Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Telemedicine adoption in cardiology: Determinants and predictors identified using Bayesian Model Averaging and Machine Learning.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Rural community peer partnerships for improving methamphetamine -associated heart failure screening and engagement in cardiology care (PEER-Heart): Study protocol.Drug and alcohol dependence reports · 2026Article
- Patient acceptance of video consultations in cardiology.European heart journal. Digital health · 2025Article
- The present and future of cardiological telemonitoring in Europe: a statement from seven European countries.Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2025Review
- LOLATAO-An Artificial-Intelligence-Based Virtual Assistant for Clinical Follow-Up of Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Undergoing Oral Anticoagulant Therapy (OAT): A Feasibility Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Mobile/wearable digital devices for care of active cancer patients: a survey from the ESC Council of Cardio-Oncology.European heart journal. Digital health · 2025Article
- Enhancing cardiac postoperative care: a smartwatch-integrated remote telemonitoring platform for health screening with ECG analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- A double-edged sword?: Digitalization, health disparities, and the paradoxical case of e-pharmacy in Ghana.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To date, mortality rates associated with heart diseases are dangerously increasing, making them the leading cause of death globally. From this point of view, digital technologies can provide health systems with the necessary support to increase prevention and monitoring, and improve care delivery. The present study proposes a review of the literature to understand the state of the art and the outcomes of international experiences. A reference framework is defined to develop reflections to optimize the use of resources and technologies, favoring the development of new organizational models and intervention strategies. Findings highlight the potential significance of e-health and telemedicine in supporting novel solutions and organizational models for cardiac illnesses as a response to the requirements and restrictions of patients and health systems. While privacy concerns and technology-acceptance-related issues arise, new avenues for research and clinical practice emerge, with the need to study ad hoc managerial models according to the type of patient and disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.