ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023
Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- A nomogram integrating dynamic total bile acid monitoring, medication history, and curative effect for preterm birth prediction in twin pregnancies with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Evaluating the Effect of Bile Acid Levels on Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes in Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy: A Retrospective Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Neonates at Risk: Understanding the Impact of High-Risk Pregnancies on Neonatal Health.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Effects of Ursodeoxycholic Acid Treatment for Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy on Maternal and Fetal Outcomes.Cureus · 2024Article
- Article
- Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and its association with preeclampsia and gestational diabetes: a retrospective analysis.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aims of our study were to evaluate the maternal and fetal outcomes of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP). In this observational, retrospective case-control study, we included all pregnant women who gave birth with a diagnosis of ICP between January 2010 and December 2020 at the Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Messina. The data were compared with those from a control group of pregnant women who did not have ICP. One hundred twenty-nine and eighty-five patients were included, respectively, in the study and in the control group. There was a significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of hypothyroidism, thrombophilia, gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension, postpartum hemorrhage, and preterm delivery, which were more frequent in the ICP patients. No neonatal adverse events were recorded, although a significant difference in the meconium-stained amniotic fluid condition was noted. After a 24-month follow-up, 48/129 patients with ICP accepted to be reassessed by liver ultrasound, elastographic examination, and liver function blood tests. No patient showed signs of chronic liver disease. This study confirmed a higher probability of adverse short-term maternal outcomes in ICP pregnant patients, but a lower probability of adverse short-term fetal outcomes and the absence of a long-term maternal risk of chronic liver disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.