Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37447398›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2023

Does Native Vitamin D Supplementation Have Pleiotropic Effects in Patients with End-Stage Kidney Disease? A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials.

Nathan G Pilkey, Olivia Novosel, Angélique Roy, Tristin E Wilson, Jaya Sharma, Sono Khan, Sanjana Kapuria, Michael A Adams, Rachel M Holden

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nathan G PilkeyDepartment of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada.
Olivia NovoselDepartment of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada.
Angélique RoyBracken Health Sciences Library, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada.
Tristin E WilsonDepartment of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada.
Jaya SharmaDepartment of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7560-3565
Sono KhanDepartment of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada.
Sanjana KapuriaDepartment of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada.
Michael A AdamsDepartment of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada.
Rachel M HoldenDepartment of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada.
Queen's University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vitamin D has been shown to have multiple pleiotropic effects beyond bone and mineral metabolism, with purported roles in cardiovascular disease, cancer, and host immunity. Vitamin D deficiency is common in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD); however, current clinical practice has favored the use of the active hormone. Whether vitamin D deficiency should be corrected in patients with ESKD remains unclear, as few randomized trials have been conducted. In this systematic review, we summarize the current evidence examining whether vitamin D supplementation improves outcomes, beyond mineral metabolism, in patients with ESKD. Data from randomized controlled trials of adults with ESKD were obtained by searching Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Web of Science Core Collection from inception to February 2023. Twenty-three trials composed of 2489 participants were identified for inclusion. Data were synthesized by two independent reviewers and summarized in tables organized by outcome. Outcomes included measures of mortality, cardiovascular disease, inflammation, muscle strength/function, nutrition, patient well-being, and outcomes specific to ESKD including erythropoietin usage, pruritus, and dialysis access maturation. The Cochrane risk of Bias Tool (RoB 2, 2019) was used to assess study quality. Overall, our findings indicate a minimal and varied benefit of native vitamin D supplementation. From the largest studies included, we determine that vitamin D has no demonstrated effect on patient-reported measures of well-being or utilization of erythropoietin, nor does it change levels of the inflammation biomarker

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesErythropoietinKidney Failure, ChronicVitamin D DeficiencyAdultDietary SupplementsHumansMineralsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRenal DialysisVitamin DVitaminsErythropoietinMineralsVitamin DVitaminscalciumend-stage kidney diseasehemodialysisparathyroid hormonephosphatevitamin D

Identifiers

PMID37447398
PMCPMC10346817
OpenAlexW4383723418

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.