Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37456307›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023

Automatic brain structure segmentation for

Zhenxing Huang, Han Liu, Yaping Wu, Wenbo Li, Jun Liu, Ruodai Wu, Jianmin Yuan, Qiang He, Zhe Wang, Ke Zhang and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Mapping the knowledge landscape of the PET/MR domain: a multidimensional bibliometric analysis.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Fusion of shallow and deep features fromQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Zhenxing Huang *Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Han Liu *Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Yaping Wu *Department of Medical Imaging, Henan Provincial People's Hospital & People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Wenbo LiLauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Jun LiuDepartment of Radiology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Ruodai WuDepartment of Radiology, Shenzhen University General Hospital, Shenzhen University Clinical Medical Academy, Shenzhen, China.
Jianmin YuanCentral Research Institute, United Imaging Healthcare Group, Shanghai, China.
Qiang HeCentral Research Institute, United Imaging Healthcare Group, Shanghai, China.
Zhe WangCentral Research Institute, United Imaging Healthcare Group, Shanghai, China.
Ke ZhangDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Dong LiangLauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Zhanli HuLauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Meiyun WangDepartment of Medical Imaging, Henan Provincial People's Hospital & People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Na ZhangLauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Brain structure segmentation is of great value in diagnosing brain disorders, allowing radiologists to quickly acquire regions of interest and assist in subsequent analyses, diagnoses and treatment. Current brain structure segmentation methods are usually applied to magnetic resonance (MR) images, which provide higher soft tissue contrast and better spatial resolution. However, fewer segmentation methods are conducted on a positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) system that combines functional and structural information to improve analysis accuracy. Methods: In this paper, we explore a dual-modality image segmentation model to segment brain Results: The experiments were conducted on the clinical head data of 120 patients, and the results show that the proposed algorithm accurately delineates brain volumes of interest (VOIs), achieving superior performance with 84.24%±1.44% Dice score, 74.36%±2.40% Jaccard, 84.33%±1.56% precision and 84.73%±1.56% sensitivity. Furthermore, compared with directly using the FreeSurfer toolkit, the proposed method reduced the segmentation time, which only needs 20 seconds to segment the whole brain for each patient. Conclusions: We present a deep learning-based method for the joint segmentation of anatomical and functional PET/MR images. Compared with other single-modality methods, our method greatly improved the accuracy of brain structure delineation, which shows great potential for brain analysis.

Indexed as

automatic segmentationbrain structuredeep learningPositron emission tomography/magnetic resonance (PET/MR)

Identifiers

PMID37456307
PMCPMC10347345

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.