ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023
Automatic brain structure segmentation for
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping the knowledge landscape of the PET/MR domain: a multidimensional bibliometric analysis.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Review
- A generative whole-brain segmentation model for positron emission tomography images.EJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- Fusion of shallow and deep features fromQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Brain structure segmentation is of great value in diagnosing brain disorders, allowing radiologists to quickly acquire regions of interest and assist in subsequent analyses, diagnoses and treatment. Current brain structure segmentation methods are usually applied to magnetic resonance (MR) images, which provide higher soft tissue contrast and better spatial resolution. However, fewer segmentation methods are conducted on a positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) system that combines functional and structural information to improve analysis accuracy. Methods: In this paper, we explore a dual-modality image segmentation model to segment brain Results: The experiments were conducted on the clinical head data of 120 patients, and the results show that the proposed algorithm accurately delineates brain volumes of interest (VOIs), achieving superior performance with 84.24%±1.44% Dice score, 74.36%±2.40% Jaccard, 84.33%±1.56% precision and 84.73%±1.56% sensitivity. Furthermore, compared with directly using the FreeSurfer toolkit, the proposed method reduced the segmentation time, which only needs 20 seconds to segment the whole brain for each patient. Conclusions: We present a deep learning-based method for the joint segmentation of anatomical and functional PET/MR images. Compared with other single-modality methods, our method greatly improved the accuracy of brain structure delineation, which shows great potential for brain analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.