Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37457303›Full record

ArticleMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development2023

CRISPR-Cas9 correction in the DMD mouse model is accompanied by upregulation of Dp71f protein.

Tatiana V Egorova, Anna V Polikarpova, Svetlana G Vassilieva, Marina A Dzhenkova, Irina M Savchenko, Oleg A Velyaev, Anna A Shmidt, Vladislav O Soldatov, Mikhail V Pokrovskii, Alexey V Deykin and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. CRISPR-Cas9-mediated upregulation of utrophin ameliorates Duchenne muscular dystrophy.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Dystrophin- and Utrophin-Based Therapeutic Approaches for Treatment of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Comparative Review.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tatiana V EgorovaLaboratory of Modeling and Therapy of Hereditary Diseases, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119334, Russia.
Anna V PolikarpovaLaboratory of Modeling and Therapy of Hereditary Diseases, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119334, Russia.
Svetlana G VassilievaLaboratory of Modeling and Therapy of Hereditary Diseases, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119334, Russia.
Marina A DzhenkovaLaboratory of Modeling and Therapy of Hereditary Diseases, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119334, Russia.
Irina M SavchenkoCenter for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Institute of Gene Biology Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119334, Russia.
Oleg A VelyaevLaboratory of Modeling and Therapy of Hereditary Diseases, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119334, Russia.
Anna A ShmidtLaboratory of Modeling and Therapy of Hereditary Diseases, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119334, Russia.
Vladislav O SoldatovResearch Institute of Living Systems Pharmacology, Belgorod National Research University, Belgorod 308007, Russia.
Mikhail V PokrovskiiResearch Institute of Living Systems Pharmacology, Belgorod National Research University, Belgorod 308007, Russia.
Alexey V DeykinMarlin Biotech LLC, Sochi 354340, Russia.
Maryana V BardinaLaboratory of Modeling and Therapy of Hereditary Diseases, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119334, Russia.
Institute of Gene Biology · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a severe hereditary disease caused by a deficiency in the dystrophin protein. The most frequent types of disease-causing mutations in the DMD gene are frameshift deletions of one or more exons. Precision genome editing systems such as CRISPR-Cas9 have shown potential to restore open reading frames in numerous animal studies. Here, we applied an AAV-CRISPR double-cut strategy to correct a mutation in the DMD mouse model with exon 8-34 deletion, encompassing the N-terminal actin-binding domain. We report successful excision of the 100-kb genomic sequence, which includes exons 6 and 7, and partial improvement in cardiorespiratory function. While corrected mRNA was abundant in muscle tissues, only a low level of truncated dystrophin was produced, possibly because of protein instability. Furthermore, CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing upregulated the Dp71f dystrophin isoform on the sarcolemma. Given the previously reported Dp71-associated muscle pathology, our results question the applicability of genome editing strategies for some DMD patients with N-terminal mutations. The safety and efficacy of CRISPR-Cas9 constructs require rigorous investigation in patient-specific animal models.

Indexed as

AAV-mediated gene therapyDMDDp71Duchenne muscular dystrophydystrophingenome editing

Identifiers

PMID37457303
PMCPMC10339130
OpenAlexW4381095256

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.