Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37460263›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Is personalised prehabilitation feasible to implement for patients undergoing oncological treatment for lung cancer at a London teaching hospital? Protocol of a feasibility trial.

Kelly Wade-Mcbane, Alex King, Catherine Urch, Lina Johansson, Mary Wells

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05318807 (A Personalised Prehabilitation Model for Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy, Radiotherapy and/or Immunotherapy Treatment for Lung Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05318807 naunknown statusnot on this map

A Personalised Prehabilitation Model for Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy, Radiotherapy and/or Immunotherapy Treatment for Lung Cancer: A Feasibility Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorImperial College Healthcare NHS TrustRan2022 to 2023Enrolled30ConditionsLung CancerArmsAssessment of level of readiness and need for personalised prehabilitation, Formation of a personalised prehabilitation plan, Daily diary
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kelly Wade-McbaneDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK k.wade-mcbane@nhs.net.ORCID 0000-0001-6509-0359
Alex KingDepartment of Surgery, Cardiovascular and Cancer, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9050-1092
Catherine UrchDepartment of Surgery, Cardiovascular and Cancer, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4251-9113
Lina JohanssonDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8571-0567
Mary WellsDepartment of Surgery and Oncology, Nursing Directorate, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5789-2773
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health NIHR302680
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is significant potential to improve outcomes for patients with lung cancer in terms of quality of life and survival. There is some evidence that prehabilitation can help, but, to date, this has only been tested in surgical populations, despite 70%-80% of patients with lung cancer in the UK receiving non-surgical treatment. The physiological and psychological benefits of prehabilitation seen in surgical patients could be extrapolated to those receiving non-surgical treatment, particularly in such a poor prognosis group. With patients and healthcare professionals, we have co-designed a personalised and evidence-based prehabilitation programme. This draws on a conceptual framework that aligns with patient values and needs as well as functional goals. We aim to investigate whether this programme is feasible to implement and evaluate in clinical practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: An open-label, single-group feasibility study incorporating quantitative assessments, a qualitative free text questionnaire and reflective field notes. Thirty participants will be recruited over an eight-month period from a single London teaching hospital. All recruited participants will receive a personalised prehabilitation programme during their oncological treatment. This includes a one-hour face-to-face appointment prior to, at week three and at week six of their treatment regimen as well as a weekly telephone call. Interventions including nutrition, physical activity and psychological well-being are stratified according to a patient's priorities, level of readiness and expressed needs. The primary outcome will be feasibility of the personalised prehabilitation programme in clinical practice by investigating areas of uncertainty regarding patient recruitment, attrition, treatment fidelity, intervention adherence and acceptability of study outcome measures. Secondary outcomes will include quality of life, functional capacity and grip strength. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained from the Health Research Authority (reference number 22/PR/0390). Results of this study will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed articles, presentations at scientific conferences and in collaboration with patient and public involvement representatives. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05318807.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsPreoperative ExerciseFeasibility StudiesHospitals, TeachingHumansLondonQuality of Lifechemotherapyradiotherapyrespiratory tract tumours

Identifiers

PMID37460263
PMCPMC10357652
OpenAlexW4384501949

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.