ArticleFunctional & integrative genomics2023
Molecular characterization and in-depth genome analysis of Enterobacter sp. S-16.
Article in Functional & integrative genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Morphological and biochemical characterization of bacterial isolates from diverse soil habitats in the Amhara region, Ethiopia.Open life sciences · 2026Article
- Genomic Insights Into Multidrug-Resistant FoodborneInternational journal of food science · 2026Article
- Functional genomics of a food-related thermotolerant Acetobacter oryzifermentans strain AAB5: genetic determinants of stress response, CAZyme repertoire, and CRISPR-Cas system.Functional & integrative genomics · 2025Article
- Article
- Discovery and characterization of a novel pathogenFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Enterobacter species are considered to be an opportunistic human pathogen owing to the existence of antibiotic-resistant strains and drug resides; however, the detailed analysis of the antibiotic resistance and virulence features in environmental isolates is poorly characterized. Here, in the study, we characterized the biochemical characteristics, and genome, pan-genome, and comparative genome analyses of an environmental isolate Enterobacter sp. S-16. The strain was identified as Enterobacter spp. by using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. To unravel genomic features, whole genome of Enterobacter sp. S-16 was sequenced using a hybrid assembly approach and genome assembly was performed using the Unicycler tool. The assembled genome contained the single conting size 5.3 Mbp, GC content 55.43%, and 4500 protein-coding genes. The genome analysis revealed the various gene clusters associated with virulence, antibiotic resistance, type VI secretion system (T6SS), and many stress tolerant genes, which may provide important insight for adapting to changing environment conditions. Moreover, different metabolic pathways were identified that potentially contribute to environmental survival. Various hydrolytic enzymes and motility functions equipped the strain S-16 as an active colonizer. The genome analysis confirms the presence of carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes), and non-enzymatic carbohydrate-binding modules (CBMs) involved in the hydrolysis of complex carbohydrate polymers. Moreover, the pan-genome analysis provides detailed information about the core genes and shared genes with the closest related Enterobacter species. The present study is the first report showing the presence of YdhE/NorM in Enterobacter spp. Thus, the elucidation of genome sequencing will increase our understanding of the pathogenic nature of environmental isolate, supporting the One Health Concept.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.