Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37460932›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2023

Treatment of humeral shaft fractures with different treatment methods: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Hao Qiu, Yuting Liu, Yu Chen, Zheng Weng, Dun Liu, Jing Dong, Minpeng Lu

Open access · goldAbstract readNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hao Qiu *Trauma Orthopedics and Hand Foot Ankle Surgery, The Ninth People's Hospital of Chongqing, Chongqing, 400700, China.
Yuting Liu *Department of Endocrinology, The Ninth People's Hospital of Chongqing, Chongqing, 400700, China.
Yu ChenTrauma Orthopedics and Hand Foot Ankle Surgery, The Ninth People's Hospital of Chongqing, Chongqing, 400700, China.
Zheng WengTrauma Orthopedics and Hand Foot Ankle Surgery, The Ninth People's Hospital of Chongqing, Chongqing, 400700, China.
Dun LiuTrauma Orthopedics and Hand Foot Ankle Surgery, The Ninth People's Hospital of Chongqing, Chongqing, 400700, China.
Jing DongDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Chongqing Medical and Pharmaceutical College, Chongqing, 401331, China. tokyo2024@126.com.
Minpeng LuDepartment of Pain Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China. luminpeng@126.com.
First People's Hospital of Chongqing · CNChongqing Medical and Pharmaceutical College · CNThe Affiliated Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University · CN

Funding

Research grants from the Scientific and Technological Research Program of Chongqing Medical and Pharmaceutical College NO. ygz2019308
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHumeral shaft fractures (HSFs) can be treated non-operatively (Non-OP), with open reduction and plate osteosynthesis (ORPO), minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO), or with intramedullary nails (IMN). However, the best treatment for HSFs still remains controversial.We performed a network meta-analysis to explore which should be the best method for HSFs.

methodsThe computerized search had been conducted on electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Medline from the establishment of the database to the end of December 2022. The quality evaluation of the included literature had been completed by Review Manager (version 5.4.1). Stata 17.0 software (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas, USA)was used for network meta-analysis.We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different treatments to treating HSFs.

resultsThe pairwise comparison results demonstrated that there was no statistical difference between IMN, MIPO, Non-OP, and ORPO in terms of radial nerve injury and infection, and Non-OP presented significantly more nonunion than ORPO, IMN, and MIPO. However, no statistically significant difference between ORPO, IMN, and MIPO was discovered. The results of the network meta-analysis displayed that surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) probabilities of IMN, MIPO, Non-OP, and ORPO in radial nerve injury were 46.5%, 66.9%, 77.3%, and 9.3%, respectively, in contrast, that in infection were 68.6%, 53.3%, 62.4%, and 15.4%, respectively, and that in nonunion were 51.7%, 93.1%, 0.7%, and 54.5%, respectively.

conclusionWe came to the conclusion that MIPO is currently the most effective way to treat HSFs.

trial registrationName of the registry: Prospero, 2. Unique Identifying number or registration ID: CRD42023411293.

Indexed as

Fracture Fixation, IntramedullaryHumeral FracturesBone PlatesFracture Fixation, InternalHumansHumerusMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeHumeral shaft fractureIntramedullary nailMinimally invasive plate osteosynthesisNetwork meta-analysisNon-operativeOpen reduction and plate osteosynthesis

Identifiers

PMID37460932
PMCPMC10351133
OpenAlexW4384559201

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.