Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37464394›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2023

Delivery and evaluation of simulations to promote authentic and meaningful engagement in childhood disability research.

Samantha K Micsinszki, Nadia L Tanel, Julia Kowal, Gillian King, Dolly Menna-Dack, Angel Chu, Kathryn Parker, Michelle Phoenix

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Developing an Inclusive Dance Guide for Children With Cerebral Palsy: A Co-Design Process and Initial Feasibility Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Samantha K MicsinszkiSchool of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1357-1158
Nadia L TanelHolland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Julia KowalHolland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Gillian KingCanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Dolly Menna-DackHolland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Angel ChuHolland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kathryn ParkerHolland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Michelle PhoenixSchool of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. phoenimp@mcmaster.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6190-3997

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2019, our interdisciplinary team of researchers, family members, and youth co-designed four simulation training videos and accompanying facilitation resources to prepare youth, family members, trainees, and researchers to build the knowledge and skills to engage in patient-oriented research (POR) authentically and meaningfully. Videos covered challenges in aspects of the research process including (1) forming a project team; (2) identifying project objectives and priorities; (3) agreeing on results; and (4) carrying out knowledge translation.

methodsThe purpose of the study was to deliver four simulation training videos across 2 two-hour facilitated workshops with researchers, trainees, and family partners. We evaluated whether the training videos and facilitated discussion of the simulations helped to improve knowledge and attitudes about authentic and meaningful partnership in research and self-perceived ability to engage in POR. An explanatory sequential two-phase mixed methods design was used. Phase 1 (quantitative) included two training workshops and a pre/post-training survey. Phase 2 (qualitative) included two qualitative focus groups. Results of each phase were analyzed separately and then combined during interpretation.

resultsSixteen individuals (including researchers/research staff, trainees, family members, clinicians) took part in this research study. Overall, participants were highly receptive to the training, providing high scores on measures of acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. While the training videos and facilitated discussion of the simulations were found to increase participants' knowledge and ability to engage in authentic and meaningful POR, we found no significant change in attitude or intent. Recommendations about the simulation content and delivery were provided to inform for future use.

conclusionsThe simulations were found to be a positive and impactful way for collaborative research teams to build knowledge and ability to engage in authentic and meaningful POR. Recommendations for future work include covering different content areas with varying levels of nuance; and offering the training to stakeholders in a variety of roles, such as those higher-ranked academic positions.

Indexed as

AuthenticChildhood disabilityEvaluationFamily engagementMeaningfulPatient engagementPatient-oriented researchSimulation

Identifiers

PMID37464394
PMCPMC10353094

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.