Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37467472›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2023

Subtle Introgression Footprints at the End of the Speciation Continuum in a Clade of Heliconius Butterflies.

Quentin Rougemont, Bárbara Huber, Simon H Martin, Annabel Whibley, Catalina Estrada, Darha Solano, Robert Orpet, W Owen McMillan, Brigitte Frérot, Mathieu Joron

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evolution of genome-wide barriers to gene flow during complex speciation in rattlesnakes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Quentin RougemontCentre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, University of Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2987-3801
Bárbara HuberInstitut de Systématique, Evolution et Biodiversité, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France.
Simon H MartinInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0747-7456
Annabel WhibleyInstitut de Systématique, Evolution et Biodiversité, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France.
Catalina EstradaSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Gamboa, Panama.
Darha SolanoSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Gamboa, Panama.
Robert OrpetSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Gamboa, Panama.ORCID 0000-0003-3009-6931
W Owen McMillanSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Gamboa, Panama.ORCID 0000-0003-2805-2745
Brigitte FrérotINRAE, CNRS, IRD, UPEC, Sorbonne Université, Institute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences of Paris, Université de Paris, Versailles, France.
Mathieu JoronCentre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, University of Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantifying gene flow between lineages at different stages of the speciation continuum is central to understanding speciation. Heliconius butterflies have undergone an adaptive radiation in wing color patterns driven partly by natural selection for local mimicry. Color patterns are also known to be used as assortative mating cues. Therefore, wing pattern divergence is considered to play a role in speciation. A corollary is that mimicry between closely related species may be associated with hybridization and interfere with reproductive isolation. Here, we take a multifaceted approach to explore speciation history, species boundaries, and traits involved in species differentiation between the two closely related species, Heliconius hecale and Heliconius ismenius. We focus on geographic regions where the two species mimic each other and contrast this with geographic regions where they do not mimic each other. To examine population history and patterns of gene flow, we tested and compared a four-population model accounting for linked selection. This model suggests that the two species have remained isolated for a large part of their history, yet with a small amount of gene exchange. Accordingly, signatures of genomic introgression were small except at a major wing pattern allele and chemosensing genes and stronger in the mimetic populations compared with nonmimetic populations. Behavioral assays confirm that visual confusion exists but that short-range cues determine strong sexual isolation. Tests for chemical differentiation between species identified major differences in putative pheromones which likely mediate mate choice and the maintenance of species differences.

Indexed as

ButterfliesGenetic SpeciationAnimalsHybridization, GeneticPhenotypeReproductive IsolationWings, Animal

Identifiers

PMID37467472
PMCPMC10375063

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.