Evidence mapPaperPMID 37468901Full record

ReviewDiabetology & metabolic syndrome2023

2023 UPDATE: Luso-Brazilian evidence-based guideline for the management of antidiabetic therapy in type 2 diabetes.

Marcello Casaccia Bertoluci, Wellington S Silva Júnior, Fernando Valente, Levimar Rocha Araujo, Ruy Lyra, João Jácome de Castro, João Filipe Raposo, Paulo Augusto Carvalho Miranda, Cesar Luiz Boguszewski, Alexandre Hohl and 23 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diabetology & metabolic syndrome, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors at 17 institutions in 2 countries.

Marcello Casaccia BertoluciFaculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil. mcbertoluci@gmail.com.
Wellington S Silva JúniorDisciplina de Endocrinologia, Departamento de Medicina I, Universidade Federal Maranhão, São Luís, Brazil.
Fernando ValenteFaculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André, Brazil.
Levimar Rocha AraujoFaculdade de Ciências Médicas de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Ruy LyraUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.
João Jácome de CastroServiço de Endocrinologia do Hospital Universitário das Forças Armadas, Lisbon, Portugal.
João Filipe RaposoNOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Paulo Augusto Carvalho MirandaClínica de Endocrinologia e Metabologia da Santa Casa Belo Horizonte, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Cesar Luiz BoguszewskiDivisão de Endocrinologia (SEMPR), Departamento de Clínica Médica, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
Alexandre HohlDepartamento de Clínica Médica da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Rui DuarteAssociação Protectora dos Diabéticos de Portugal, Lisbon, Portugal.
João Eduardo Nunes SallesFaculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
José Silva-NunesNOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Jorge DoresCentro Hospitalar e Universitário de Santo António, Lisbon, Portugal.
Miguel MeloServiço de Endocrinologia, Diabetes e Metabolismo, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
João Roberto de SáFaculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André, Brazil.
João Sérgio NevesCardiovascular R&D Centre (UnIC@RISE), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Rodrigo Oliveira MoreiraInstituto Estadual de Diabetes e Endocrinologia Luiz Capriglione (IEDE), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Marcus Vinícius Bolívar MalachiasFaculdade de Ciências Médicas de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Rodrigo Nunes LamounierDepartamento de Clínica Médica da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Domingos Augusto MalerbiHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luis Eduardo CalliariFaculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luis Miguel Cardosoi3S, Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Maria Raquel CarvalhoHospital CUF, Tejo, Portugal.
Hélder José FerreiraClínica Grupo Sanfil Medicina, Coimbra, Portugal.
Rita NortadasAssociação Protectora dos Diabéticos de Portugal, Lisbon, Portugal.
Fábio Rogério TrujilhoFaculdade de Medicina da UniFTC, Salvador, Brazil.
Cristiane Bauermann LeitãoFaculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
José Augusto Rodrigues SimõesFaculdade de Ciências da Saúde da Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.
Mónica Isabel Natal Dos ReisUnidade Integrada de Diabetes Mellitus do Hospital de Vila Franca de Xira, Vila Franca de Xira, Portugal.
Pedro MeloServiço de Endocrinologia, Hospital Pedro Hispano, Matosinhos, Portugal.
Mafalda MarcelinoServiço de Endocrinologia do Hospital Universitário das Forças Armadas, Lisbon, Portugal.
Davide CarvalhoFaculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia · PTSociedade Portuguesa de Inovação · PTFaculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo · BRFaculdade de Ciências Médicas de Minas Gerais · BRHospitais da Universidade de Coimbra · PTSociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia · BRSociedade Brasileira de Diabetes · BRSociedade Brasileira de Oncologia Clínica · BRSociedade Brasileira de Pediatria · BRUniversidade do Porto · PTUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BRCUF Porto Hospital · PTFaculdade de Medicina do ABC · BRHospital Vila Franca de Xira · PTInstituto Estadual de Diabetes e Endocrinologia Luiz Capriglione · BRUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco · BRUniversidade Nova de Lisboa · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe management of antidiabetic therapy in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) has evolved beyond glycemic control. In this context, Brazil and Portugal defined a joint panel of four leading diabetes societies to update the guideline published in 2020.

methodsThe panelists searched MEDLINE (via PubMed) for the best evidence from clinical studies on treating T2D and its cardiorenal complications. The panel searched for evidence on antidiabetic therapy in people with T2D without cardiorenal disease and in patients with T2D and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), heart failure (HF), or diabetic kidney disease (DKD). The degree of recommendation and the level of evidence were determined using predefined criteria. RESULTS AND

conclusionsAll people with T2D need to have their cardiovascular (CV) risk status stratified and HbA1c, BMI, and eGFR assessed before defining therapy. An HbA1c target of less than 7% is adequate for most adults, and a more flexible target (up to 8%) should be considered in frail older people. Non-pharmacological approaches are recommended during all phases of treatment. In treatment naïve T2D individuals without cardiorenal complications, metformin is the agent of choice when HbA1c is 7.5% or below. When HbA1c is above 7.5% to 9%, starting with dual therapy is recommended, and triple therapy may be considered. When HbA1c is above 9%, starting with dual therapyt is recommended, and triple therapy should be considered. Antidiabetic drugs with proven CV benefit (AD1) are recommended to reduce CV events if the patient is at high or very high CV risk, and antidiabetic agents with proven efficacy in weight reduction should be considered when obesity is present. If HbA1c remains above target, intensification is recommended with triple, quadruple therapy, or even insulin-based therapy. In people with T2D and established ASCVD, AD1 agents (SGLT2 inhibitors or GLP-1 RA with proven CV benefit) are initially recommended to reduce CV outcomes, and metformin or a second AD1 may be necessary to improve glycemic control if HbA1c is above the target. In T2D with HF, SGLT2 inhibitors are recommended to reduce HF hospitalizations and mortality and to improve HbA1c. In patients with DKD, SGLT2 inhibitors in combination with metformin are recommended when eGFR is above 30 mL/min/1.73 m

Indexed as

ASCVDAtherosclerotic diseaseCardiovascular riskChronic kidney diseaseDiabetes treatmentDKDGLP-1 RAGuidelinesHeart failureIschemic heart diseaseSGLT2 inhibitorsType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID37468901
PMCPMC10354939
OpenAlexW4384820325

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.