Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37469447›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2023

Recent advances on 3D-printed PCL-based composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.

Maliheh Gharibshahian, Majid Salehi, Nima Beheshtizadeh, Mohammad Kamalabadi-Farahani, Amir Atashi, Mohammad-Sadegh Nourbakhsh, Morteza Alizadeh

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
18.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 168 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Maliheh GharibshahianStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran.
Majid SalehiDepartment of Tissue Engineering, School of Medicine, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran.
Nima BeheshtizadehRegenerative Medicine Group (REMED), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Kamalabadi-FarahaniDepartment of Tissue Engineering, School of Medicine, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran.
Amir AtashiTissue Engineering and Stem Cells Research Center, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran.
Mohammad-Sadegh NourbakhshFaculty of New Sciences and Technologies, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran.
Morteza AlizadehDepartment of Tissue Engineering, School of Medicine, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran.
Shahroud University of Medical Sciences · IRSemnan University · IRUniversal Scientific Education and Research Network · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Population ageing and various diseases have increased the demand for bone grafts in recent decades. Bone tissue engineering (BTE) using a three-dimensional (3D) scaffold helps to create a suitable microenvironment for cell proliferation and regeneration of damaged tissues or organs. The 3D printing technique is a beneficial tool in BTE scaffold fabrication with appropriate features such as spatial control of microarchitecture and scaffold composition, high efficiency, and high precision. Various biomaterials could be used in BTE applications. PCL, as a thermoplastic and linear aliphatic polyester, is one of the most widely used polymers in bone scaffold fabrication. High biocompatibility, low cost, easy processing, non-carcinogenicity, low immunogenicity, and a slow degradation rate make this semi-crystalline polymer suitable for use in load-bearing bones. Combining PCL with other biomaterials, drugs, growth factors, and cells has improved its properties and helped heal bone lesions. The integration of PCL composites with the new 3D printing method has made it a promising approach for the effective treatment of bone injuries. The purpose of this review is give a comprehensive overview of the role of printed PCL composite scaffolds in bone repair and the path ahead to enter the clinic. This study will investigate the types of 3D printing methods for making PCL composites and the optimal compounds for making PCL composites to accelerate bone healing.

Indexed as

3D printed PCL3D printingbone scaffoldsbone tissue engineeringPCL composites

Identifiers

PMID37469447
PMCPMC10353441
OpenAlexW4381164380

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.