Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37469769›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023

Mitochondrial genome annotation with MFannot: a critical analysis of gene identification and gene model prediction.

B Franz Lang, Natacha Beck, Samuel Prince, Matt Sarrasin, Pierre Rioux, Gertraud Burger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. RhoMitoAnnotator and Polypods, Bioinformatics Tools for theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Mitochondrial Graph-Based Pan-Genome Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

B Franz LangRobert Cedergren Center for Bioinformatics and Genomics, Département de Biochimie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Natacha BeckRobert Cedergren Center for Bioinformatics and Genomics, Département de Biochimie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Samuel PrinceRobert Cedergren Center for Bioinformatics and Genomics, Département de Biochimie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Matt SarrasinRobert Cedergren Center for Bioinformatics and Genomics, Département de Biochimie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Pierre RiouxRobert Cedergren Center for Bioinformatics and Genomics, Département de Biochimie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Gertraud BurgerRobert Cedergren Center for Bioinformatics and Genomics, Département de Biochimie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compared to nuclear genomes, mitochondrial genomes (mitogenomes) are small and usually code for only a few dozen genes. Still, identifying genes and their structure can be challenging and time-consuming. Even automated tools for mitochondrial genome annotation often require manual analysis and curation by skilled experts. The most difficult steps are (i) the structural modelling of intron-containing genes; (ii) the identification and delineation of Group I and II introns; and (iii) the identification of moderately conserved, non-coding RNA (ncRNA) genes specifying 5S rRNAs, tmRNAs and RNase P RNAs. Additional challenges arise through genetic code evolution which can redefine the translational identity of both start and stop codons, thus obscuring protein-coding genes. Further, RNA editing can render gene identification difficult, if not impossible, without additional RNA sequence data. Current automated mito- and plastid-genome annotators are limited as they are typically tailored to specific eukaryotic groups. The MFannot annotator we developed is unique in its applicability to a broad taxonomic scope, its accuracy in gene model inference, and its capabilities in intron identification and classification. The pipeline leverages curated profile Hidden Markov Models (HMMs), covariance (CMs) and ERPIN models to better capture evolutionarily conserved signatures in the primary sequence (HMMs and CMs) as well as secondary structure (CMs and ERPIN). Here we formally describe MFannot, which has been available as a web-accessible service (https://megasun.bch.umontreal.ca/apps/mfannot/) to the research community for nearly 16 years. Further, we report its performance on particularly intron-rich mitogenomes and describe ongoing and future developments.

Indexed as

covariance modelsERPINgenome annotationintronsmitochondrial DNAprofile HMMsRNA structure

Identifiers

PMID37469769
PMCPMC10352661

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.