Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37474739›Full record

ArticleNature structural & molecular biology2023

The SUMO-NIP45 pathway processes toxic DNA catenanes to prevent mitotic failure.

Emil P T Hertz, Ignacio Alonso-de Vega, Thomas Kruse, Yiqing Wang, Ivo A Hendriks, Anna H Bizard, Ania Eugui-Anta, Ronald T Hay, Michael L Nielsen, Jakob Nilsson and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature structural & molecular biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Multifaceted roles of SUMO in DNA metabolism.Nucleus (Austin, Tex.) · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. SUMO and the DNA damage response.Biochemical Society transactions · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Emil P T HertzProtein Signaling Program, Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. emil.hertz@cpr.ku.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6996-3559
Ignacio Alonso-de VegaProtein Signaling Program, Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Thomas KruseProtein Signaling Program, Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Yiqing WangCenter for Chromosome Stability, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7174-2277
Ivo A HendriksProteomics Program, Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1439-3701
Anna H BizardCenter for Chromosome Stability, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1858-3999
Ania Eugui-AntaCentre for Gene Regulation and Expression, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Ronald T HayCentre for Gene Regulation and Expression, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7113-9024
Michael L NielsenProteomics Program, Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0067-9039
Jakob NilssonProtein Signaling Program, Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4100-1125
Ian D HicksonCenter for Chromosome Stability, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0583-566X
Niels MailandProtein Signaling Program, Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. niels.mailand@cpr.ku.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6623-709X
University of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Dundee · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SUMOylation regulates numerous cellular processes, but what represents the essential functions of this protein modification remains unclear. To address this, we performed genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9-based screens, revealing that the BLM-TOP3A-RMI1-RMI2 (BTRR)-PICH pathway, which resolves ultrafine anaphase DNA bridges (UFBs) arising from catenated DNA structures, and the poorly characterized protein NIP45/NFATC2IP become indispensable for cell proliferation when SUMOylation is inhibited. We demonstrate that NIP45 and SUMOylation orchestrate an interphase pathway for converting DNA catenanes into double-strand breaks (DSBs) that activate the G2 DNA-damage checkpoint, thereby preventing cytokinesis failure and binucleation when BTRR-PICH-dependent UFB resolution is defective. NIP45 mediates this new TOP2-independent DNA catenane resolution process via its SUMO-like domains, promoting SUMOylation of specific factors including the SLX4 multi-nuclease complex, which contributes to catenane conversion into DSBs. Our findings establish that SUMOylation exerts its essential role in cell proliferation by enabling resolution of toxic DNA catenanes via nonepistatic NIP45- and BTRR-PICH-dependent pathways to prevent mitotic failure.

Indexed as

AnaphaseDNA, CatenatedDNASumoylationDNADNA, Catenated

Identifiers

PMID37474739
PMCPMC10497417
OpenAlexW4384925674

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.