ArticleObesity surgery2023
Histopathological Findings in Turkish Patients Undergoing Sleeve Gastrectomy: Is Histopathologic Examination of Sleeve Gastrectomy Specimens Clinically Important?
Article in Obesity surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSleeve gastrectomy (SG) is a widely used surgical method in the treatment of obesity. This study aimed to reveal the histopathological changes in SG materials and to investigate the prevalence of clinically important lesions requiring follow-up. MATERIALS AND
methodsThree hundred five patients' data who underwent SG were analyzed. Cases were divided into three groups as normal, chronic inactive gastritis (CIG), and chronic active gastritis (CAG). Age, gender, and body mass index (BMI) of the three groups and the differences in the gastritis parameters of CIG and CAG groups were compared.
resultsThirty-three patients (10.8%) were in the normal group, 145 (47.5%) were in the CIG group, and 127 (41.6%) were in the CAG group. Preoperative endoscopic examination was performed in all cases, but Helicobacter pylori (HP) treatment was not applied. HP were detected in 39.3%, atrophy in 3.9%, intestinal metaplasia (IM) in 4.9%, and lymphoid follicle (LF) in 30% of the cases. Inflammation, atrophy, IM, LF, and HP were significantly higher in the CAG group. The proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-related changes were seen in 20 cases and it was more frequent in the CIG group. Intramucosal signet ring cell carcinoma was detected in 1 case. Endocrine cell hyperplasia and dysplasia were present in 7 cases with CAG. Multiple grade 1 neuroendocrine tumors were detected in just 1 case.
conclusionIn our SG specimens, HP and clinically important lesions were significantly higher in the CAG group. Pathological examination should be carefully done as the lesions detected in SG specimens can change patient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.