ArticleMolecular genetics & genomic medicine2023
11q13.3q13.4 deletion plus 9q21.13q21.33 duplication in an affected girl arising from a familial four-way balanced chromosomal translocation.
Article in Molecular genetics & genomic medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Case Report: Optical genome mapping enables identification of complex balanced chromosomal rearrangements.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Optical Genome Mapping for Chromosomal Aberrations Detection-False-Negative Results and Contributing Factors.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Confusing finding of quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction analysis in invasive prenatal genetic diagnosis: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2023Article
- 11q13.3q13.4 deletion plus 9q21.13q21.33 duplication in an affected girl arising from a familial four-way balanced chromosomal translocation.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe describe a 13-year-old girl with a 11q13.3q13.4 deletion encompassing the SHANK2 gene and a 9q21.13q21.33 duplication. She presented with pre- and postnatal growth retardation, global developmental delay, severe language delay, cardiac abnormalities, and dysmorphisms. Her maternal family members all had histories of reproductive problems.
methodsMaternal family members with histories of reproductive problems were studied using G-banded karyotyping and optical genome mapping (OGM). Long-range PCR (LR-PCR) and Sanger sequencing were used to confirm the precise break point sequences obtained by OGM.
resultsG-banded karyotyping characterized the cytogenetic results as 46,XX,der(9)?del(9)(q21q22)t(9;14)(q22;q24),der(11)ins(11;?9)(q13;?q21q22),der(14)t(9;14). Using OGM, we determined that asymptomatic female family members with reproductive problems were carriers of a four-way balanced chromosome translocation. Their karyotype results were further refined as 46,XX,der(9)del(9)(q21.13q21.33)t(9;14)(q21.33;q22.31),der(11)del(11)(q13.3q13.4)ins(11;9)(q13.3;q21.33q21.13),der(14)t(9:14)ins(14;11)(q23.1;q13.4q13.3). Thus, we confirmed that the affected girl inherited the maternally derived chromosome 11. Furthermore, using LR-PCR, we showed that three disease-related genes (TMC1, NTRK2, and KIAA0586) were disrupted by the breakpoints.
conclusionsOur case highlights the importance of timely parental origin testing for patients with rare copy number variations, as well as the accurate characterization of balanced chromosomal rearrangements in families with reproductive problems. In addition, our case demonstrates that OGM is a useful clinical application for analyzing complex structural variations within the human genome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.