Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37479701›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Data collaboration analysis in predicting diabetes from a small amount of health checkup data.

Go Uchitachimoto, Noriyoshi Sukegawa, Masayuki Kojima, Rina Kagawa, Takashi Oyama, Yukihiko Okada, Akira Imakura, Tetsuya Sakurai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Go UchitachimotoMaster's Program in Service Engineering, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Noriyoshi SukegawaFaculty of Science and Engineering, Hosei University, Tokyo, Japan. sukegawa@hosei.ac.jp.
Masayuki KojimaMaster's Program in Service Engineering, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Rina KagawaInstitute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Takashi OyamaHealth Department, National Health Insurance Division, Tsukuba, Japan.
Yukihiko OkadaFaculty of System and Information Engineering, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Akira ImakuraFaculty of System and Information Engineering, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Tetsuya SakuraiFaculty of System and Information Engineering, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
University of Tsukuba · JPHosei University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies showed that machine learning models such as gradient-boosting decision tree (GBDT) can predict diabetes with high accuracy from big data. In this study, we asked whether highly accurate prediction of diabetes is possible even from small data by expanding the amount of data through data collaboration (DC) analysis, a modern framework for integrating and analyzing data accumulated at multiple institutions while ensuring confidentiality. To this end, we focused on data from two institutions: health checkup data of 1502 citizens accumulated in Tsukuba City and health history data of 1399 patients collected at the University of Tsukuba Hospital. When using only the health checkup data, the ROC-AUC and Recall for logistic regression (LR) were 0.858 ± 0.014 and 0.970 ± 0.019, respectively, while those for GBDT were 0.856 ± 0.014 and 0.983 ± 0.016, respectively. When using also the health history data through DC analysis, these values for LR improved to 0.875 ± 0.013 and 0.993 ± 0.009, respectively, while those for GBDT deteriorated because of the low compatibility with a method used for confidential data sharing (although DC analysis brought improvements). Even in a situation where health checkup data of only 324 citizens are available, the ROC-AUC and Recall for LR were 0.767 ± 0.025 and 0.867 ± 0.04, respectively, thanks to DC analysis, indicating an 11% and 12% improvement. Thus, we concluded that the answer to the above question was "Yes" for LR but "No" for GBDT for the data set tested in this study.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusHumansLogistic ModelsMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID37479701
PMCPMC10361975
OpenAlexW4385064416

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.