Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37483386›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2023

Kaylyn R Scanlon, Gabrielle Keb, Katerina Wolf, Travis J Jewett, Kenneth A Fields

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. ThemBio · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. ThebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. mSphere · 2025
    Article
  5. The N-terminus of theMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  6. The N-terminus of thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Dynamin-dependent entry ofResearch square · 2023
    Article
  11. Molecular pathogenesis ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kaylyn R ScanlonDivision of Immunity and Pathogenesis, Burnett School of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States.
Gabrielle KebDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Molecular Genetics, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States.
Katerina WolfDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Molecular Genetics, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States.
Travis J JewettDivision of Immunity and Pathogenesis, Burnett School of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States.
Kenneth A FieldsDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Molecular Genetics, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States.

Funding

Type III exported effectors of Chlamydia trachomatisR01AI065530 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI FIELDS, KENNETH A · 2005 to 2021
$5.7M
Molecular Analysis of the Chlamydia trachomatis virulence factor TarpR01AI139242 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA · PI JEWETT, TRAVIS JAMES · 2019 to 2022
$2.3M
Chlamydia type III effectors affecting the host actin-based cytoskeletonR01AI175220 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI KENNETH A FIELDS · 2023 to 2026
$2.2M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI065530NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI139242NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI175220
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

ActinsChlamydia trachomatisBacterial ProteinsHeLa CellsHumansPolymerizationActinsBacterial Proteinsactincytoskeletoninvasionpathogenesistype III secretion

Identifiers

PMID37483386
PMCPMC10360934

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.