Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37483763›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Machine learning for detecting Wilson's disease by amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation.

Bing Zhang, Jingjing Peng, Hong Chen, Wenbin Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bing ZhangGraduate School of Anhui University of Chinese Medicine,230012, China.
Jingjing PengGraduate School of Anhui University of Chinese Medicine,230012, China.
Hong ChenGraduate School of Anhui University of Chinese Medicine,230012, China.
Wenbin HuGraduate School of Anhui University of Chinese Medicine,230012, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wilson's disease (WD) is a genetic disorder with the A7P7B gene mutations. It is difficult to diagnose in clinic. The purpose of this study was to confirm whether amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF) is one of the potential biomarkers for the diagnosis of WD. The study enrolled 30 healthy controls (HCs) and 37 WD patients (WDs) to obtain their resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) data. ALFF was obtained through preprocessing of the rs-fMRI data. To distinguish between patients with WDs and HCs, four clusters with abnormal ALFF-z values were identified through between-group comparisons. Based on these clusters, three machine learning models were developed, including Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Logistic Regression (LR). Abnormal ALFF z-values were also combined with volume information, clinical variables, and imaging features to develop machine learning models. There were 4 clusters where the ALFF z-values of the WDs were significantly higher than that of the HCs. Cluster1 was in the cerebellar region, Cluster2 was in the left caudate nucleus, Cluster3 was in the bilateral thalamus, and Cluster4 was in the right caudate nucleus. In the training set and test set, the models trained with Cluster2, Cluster3, and Cluster4 achieved area of curve (AUC) greater than 0.80. In the Delong test, only the AUC values of models trained with Cluster4 exhibited statistical significance. The AUC values of the Logit model (P = 0.04) and RF model (P = 0.04) were significantly higher than those of the SVM model. In the test set, the LR model and RF model trained with Cluster3 had high specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy. By conducting the Delong test, we discovered that there was no statistically significant inter-group difference in AUC values between the model that integrates multi-modal information and the model before fusion. The LR models trained with multimodal information and Cluster 4, as well as the LR and RF models trained with multimodal information and Cluster 3, have demonstrated high accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity. Overall, these findings suggest that using ALFF based on the thalamus or caudate nucleus as markers can effectively differentiate between WDs and HCs. The fusion of multimodal information did not significantly improve the classification performance of the models before fusion.

Indexed as

Amplitude of low-frequency fluctuationsMachine learningResting-state functional magnetic resonance imagingWilson's disease

Identifiers

PMID37483763
PMCPMC10362133

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.