Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37487210›Full record

ArticleAnnals of internal medicine2023

Disparities in Guideline-Recommended Statin Use for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease by Race, Ethnicity, and Gender : A Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Analysis of Adults in the United States.

David A Frank, Amber E Johnson, Leslie R M Hausmann, Walid F Gellad, Eric T Roberts, Ravy K Vajravelu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of internal medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Prevalence of statin utilization in cancer survivors in a family medicine clinic.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Trends in Co-morbid Dementia and Chronic Kidney Disease.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. LGBTQ+ cardiovascular health equity: a brief review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David A FrankCenter for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, and Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (D.A.F.).
Amber E JohnsonDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (A.E.J.).ORCID 0000-0003-1252-0735
Leslie R M HausmannCenter for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, and Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (L.R.M.H., W.F.G.).ORCID 0000-0002-3909-6009
Walid F GelladCenter for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, and Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (L.R.M.H., W.F.G.).
Eric T RobertsDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (E.T.R.).ORCID 0000-0002-7439-0799
Ravy K VajraveluCenter for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, and Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (R.K.V.).ORCID 0000-0002-6557-3307
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Evaluation of multiple medication exposures concurrently using a novel algorithmK08DK119475 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI VAJRAVELU, RAVY KUPPALAPALLE · 2019 to 2023
$797k
NIDDK NIH HHS K08 DK119475
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough statins are a class I recommendation for prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and its complications, their use is suboptimal. Differential underuse may mediate disparities in cardiovascular health for systematically marginalized persons.

objectiveTo estimate disparities in statin use by race-ethnicity-gender and to determine whether these potential disparities are explained by medical appropriateness of therapy and structural factors.

designCross-sectional analysis.

settingNational Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2015 to 2020.

participantsPersons eligible for statin therapy based on 2013 and 2018 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association blood cholesterol guidelines. MEASUREMENTS: The independent variable was race-ethnicity-gender. The outcome of interest was use of a statin. Using the Institute of Medicine framework for examining unequal treatment, we calculated adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) to estimate disparities in statin use adjusted for age, disease severity, access to health care, and socioeconomic status relative to non-Hispanic White men.

resultsFor primary prevention, we identified a lower prevalence of statin use that was not explained by measurable differences in disease severity or structural factors among non-Hispanic Black men (aPR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.59 to 0.88]) and non-Mexican Hispanic women (aPR, 0.74 [CI, 0.53 to 0.95]). For secondary prevention, we identified a lower prevalence of statin use that was not explained by measurable differences in disease severity or structural factors for non-Hispanic Black men (aPR, 0.81 [CI, 0.64 to 0.97]), other/multiracial men (aPR, 0.58 [CI, 0.20 to 0.97]), Mexican American women (aPR, 0.36 [CI, 0.10 to 0.61]), non-Mexican Hispanic women (aPR, 0.57 [CI, 0.33 to 0.82), non-Hispanic White women (aPR, 0.69 [CI, 0.56 to 0.83]), and non-Hispanic Black women (aPR, 0.75 [CI, 0.57 to 0.92]). LIMITATION: Cross-sectional data; lack of geographic, language, or statin-dose data.

conclusionStatin use disparities for several race-ethnicity-gender groups are not explained by measurable differences in medical appropriateness of therapy, access to health care, and socioeconomic status. These residual disparities may be partially mediated by unobserved processes that contribute to health inequity, including bias, stereotyping, and mistrust. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institutes of Health.

Indexed as

AtherosclerosisCardiovascular DiseasesHealthcare DisparitiesHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsAdultBlack or African AmericanCross-Sectional StudiesEthnicityFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansMaleNutrition SurveysUnited StatesWhiteHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID37487210
PMCPMC10804313
OpenAlexW4385209674

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.