Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37488486›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2023

Using social interaction models for genetic analysis of skin damage in gilts.

Natália Galoro Leite, Egbert Knol, Shogo Tsuruta, Stefanie Nuphaus, Roos Vogelzang, Daniela Lourenco

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Natália Galoro LeiteDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA. nataliagaloro@uga.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9327-426X
Egbert KnolTopigs Norsvin Research Center, Beuningen, GE, 6641 SZ, The Netherlands.
Shogo TsurutaDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
Stefanie NuphausTopigs Norsvin Research Center, Beuningen, GE, 6641 SZ, The Netherlands.
Roos VogelzangTopigs Norsvin Research Center, Beuningen, GE, 6641 SZ, The Netherlands.
Daniela LourencoDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
Topigs Norsvin (Netherlands) · NLUniversity of Georgia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSkin damage is a trait of economic and welfare importance that results from social interactions between animals. These interactions may produce wound signs on the gilt's skin as a result of damage behavior (i.e., fighting), biting syndromes (i.e., tail, vulva, or ear biting), and swine inflammation and necrosis syndrome. Although current selection for traits that are affected by social interactions primarily focuses on improving direct genetic effects, combined selection on direct and social genetic effects could increase genetic gain and avoid a negative response to selection in cases of competitive behavior. The objectives of this study were to (1) estimate variance components for combined skin damage (CSD), with or without accounting for social genetic effects, (2) investigate the impact of including genomic information on the prediction accuracy, bias, and dispersion of CSD estimated breeding values, and (3) perform a single-step genome-wide association study (ssGWAS) of CSD under a classical and a social interaction model.

resultsOur results show that CSD is heritable and affected by social genetic effects. Modeling CSD with social interaction models increased the total heritable variance relative to the phenotypic variance by three-fold compared to the classical model. Including genomic information increased the prediction accuracy of direct, social, and total estimated breeding values for purebred sires by at least 21.2%. Bias and dispersion of estimated breeding values were reduced by including genomic information in classical and social interaction models but remained present. The ssGWAS did not identify any single nucleotide polymorphism that was significantly associated with social or direct genetic effects for CSD.

conclusionsCombined skin damage is heritable, and genetic selection against this trait will increase the welfare of animals in the long term. Combined skin damage is affected by social genetic effects, and modeling this trait with a social interaction model increases the potential for genetic improvement. Including genomic information increases the prediction accuracy of estimated breeding values and reduces their bias and dispersion, although some biases persist. The results of the genome-wide association study indicate that CSD has a polygenic architecture and no major quantitative trait locus was detected.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudySocial InteractionAnimalsCompetitive BehaviorFemaleGenomicsSus scrofaSwine

Identifiers

PMID37488486
PMCPMC10364388
OpenAlexW4385226549

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.