Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37489348›Full record

ReviewPharmacy (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Effectiveness and Safety of Glucosamine in Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review.

Nam Xuan Vo, Ngan Nguyen Hoang Le, Trinh Dang Phuong Chu, Huong Lai Pham, Khang Xuan An Dinh, Uyen Thi Thuc Che, Thanh Thi Thanh Ngo, Tien Thuy Bui

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Glucosamine as a regulator of O-GlcNAc signaling: linking metabolism to disease pathogenesis.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nam Xuan VoFaculty of Pharmacy, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0002-1406-7949
Ngan Nguyen Hoang LeFaculty of Pharmacy, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam.
Trinh Dang Phuong ChuFaculty of Pharmacy, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam.
Huong Lai PhamFaculty of Pharmacy, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam.
Khang Xuan An DinhFaculty of Pharmacy, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam.
Uyen Thi Thuc CheFaculty of Pharmacy, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam.
Thanh Thi Thanh NgoFaculty of Pharmacy, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam.
Tien Thuy BuiFaculty of Pharmacy, Le Van Thinh Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam.ORCID 0009-0002-0065-6803
Ton Duc Thang University · VNPham Ngoc Thach Hospital · VN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knee osteoarthritis is the most popular type of osteoarthritis that causes extreme pain in the elderly. Currently, there is no cure for osteoarthritis. To lessen clinical symptoms, glucosamine was suggested. The primary goal of our systematic review study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of glucosamine based on recent studies. Electronic databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane were used to assess the randomized controlled trial (RCT). From the beginning through March 2023, the papers were checked, and if they fulfilled the inclusion criteria, they were then examined. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scales were considered the main outcome measures. A total of 15 studies were selected. Global pain was significantly decreased in comparison to placebo, as measured by the VAS index, with an overall effect size of standardized mean difference (SMD) of -7.41 ([95% CI] 14.31, 0.51). The WOMAC scale confirmed that pain, stiffness, and physical function had improved, however the effects were insufficient. A statistical update also revealed that there were no reports of serious medication interactions or significant adverse events. To summarize, glucosamine is more effective than a placebo at reducing pain in knee osteoarthritis patients. In long-term treatment, oral glucosamine sulfate 1500 mg/day is believed to be well tolerated.

Indexed as

effectivenessglucosamineosteoarthritissafetysystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37489348
PMCPMC10366893
OpenAlexW4384525431

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.