Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37489448›Full record

ArticleDiseases (Basel, Switzerland)2023

The Contribution of Multiplexing Single Cell RNA Sequencing in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Lamia Madaci, Charlyne Gard, Sébastien Nin, Geoffroy Venton, Pascal Rihet, Denis Puthier, Béatrice Loriod, Régis Costello

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diseases (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lamia MadaciTAGC, INSERM, UMR1090, Aix Marseille University, Parc Scientifique de Luminy, 13009 Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6870-3712
Charlyne GardTAGC, INSERM, UMR1090, Aix Marseille University, Parc Scientifique de Luminy, 13009 Marseille, France.ORCID 0009-0004-1608-0110
Sébastien NinTAGC, INSERM, UMR1090, Aix Marseille University, Parc Scientifique de Luminy, 13009 Marseille, France.
Geoffroy VentonTAGC, INSERM, UMR1090, Aix Marseille University, Parc Scientifique de Luminy, 13009 Marseille, France.
Pascal RihetTAGC, INSERM, UMR1090, Aix Marseille University, Parc Scientifique de Luminy, 13009 Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9459-3905
Denis PuthierTAGC, INSERM, UMR1090, Aix Marseille University, Parc Scientifique de Luminy, 13009 Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7240-5280
Béatrice LoriodTAGC, INSERM, UMR1090, Aix Marseille University, Parc Scientifique de Luminy, 13009 Marseille, France.
Régis CostelloTAGC, INSERM, UMR1090, Aix Marseille University, Parc Scientifique de Luminy, 13009 Marseille, France.
Inserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decades ago, the treatment for acute myeloid leukemia relied on cytarabine and anthracycline. However, advancements in medical research have introduced targeted therapies, initially employing monoclonal antibodies such as ant-CD52 and anti-CD123, and subsequently utilizing specific inhibitors that target molecular mutations like anti-IDH1, IDH2, or FLT3. The challenge lies in determining the role of these therapeutic options, considering the inherent tumor heterogeneity associated with leukemia diagnosis and the clonal drift that this type of tumor can undergo. Targeted drugs necessitate an examination of various therapeutic targets at the individual cell level rather than assessing the entire population. It is crucial to differentiate between the prognostic value and therapeutic potential of a specific molecular target, depending on whether it is found in a terminally differentiated cell with limited proliferative potential or a stem cell with robust capabilities for both proliferation and self-renewal. However, this cell-by-cell analysis is accompanied by several challenges. Firstly, the scientific aspect poses difficulties in comparing different single cell analysis experiments despite efforts to standardize the results through various techniques. Secondly, there are practical obstacles as each individual cell experiment incurs significant financial costs and consumes a substantial amount of time. A viable solution lies in the ability to process multiple samples simultaneously, which is a distinctive feature of the cell hashing technique. In this study, we demonstrate the applicability of the cell hashing technique for analyzing acute myeloid leukemia cells. By comparing it to standard single cell analysis, we establish a strong correlation in various parameters such as quality control, gene expression, and the analysis of leukemic blast markers in patients. Consequently, this technique holds the potential to become an integral part of the biological assessment of acute myeloid leukemia, contributing to the personalized and optimized management of the disease, particularly in the context of employing targeted therapies.

Indexed as

acute myeloid leukemiacell multiplexingclonal evolutionleukemia stem cellsingle cell RNA sequencingtargeted therapytumor heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID37489448
PMCPMC10366847
OpenAlexW4384110969

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.