Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37491990›Full record

ReviewClinical endoscopy2023

Detecting colorectal lesions with image-enhanced endoscopy: an updated review from clinical trials.

Mizuki Nagai, Sho Suzuki, Yohei Minato, Fumiaki Ishibashi, Kentaro Mochida, Ken Ohata, Tetsuo Morishita

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. A naturally brighter approach to colorectal cancer detection.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mizuki NagaiDepartment of Gastroenterology, International University of Health and Welfare Ichikawa Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Sho SuzukiDepartment of Gastroenterology, International University of Health and Welfare Ichikawa Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Yohei MinatoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Fumiaki IshibashiDepartment of Gastroenterology, International University of Health and Welfare Ichikawa Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Kentaro MochidaDepartment of Gastroenterology, International University of Health and Welfare Ichikawa Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Ken OhataDepartment of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Tetsuo MorishitaDepartment of Gastroenterology, International University of Health and Welfare Ichikawa Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
International University of Health and Welfare · JPNTT Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colonoscopy plays an important role in reducing the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer by detecting adenomas and other precancerous lesions. Image-enhanced endoscopy (IEE) increases lesion visibility by enhancing the microstructure, blood vessels, and mucosal surface color, resulting in the detection of colorectal lesions. In recent years, various IEE techniques have been used in clinical practice, each with its unique characteristics. Numerous studies have reported the effectiveness of IEE in the detection of colorectal lesions. IEEs can be divided into two broad categories according to the nature of the image: images constructed using narrowband wavelength light, such as narrowband imaging and blue laser imaging/blue light imaging, or color images based on white light, such as linked color imaging, texture and color enhancement imaging, and i-scan. Conversely, artificial intelligence (AI) systems, such as computer-aided diagnosis systems, have recently been developed to assist endoscopists in detecting colorectal lesions during colonoscopy. To better understand the features of each IEE, this review presents the effectiveness of each type of IEE and their combination with AI for colorectal lesion detection by referencing the latest research data.

Indexed as

AdenomaArtificial intelligenceColonoscopyEndoscopyPolyps

Identifiers

PMID37491990
PMCPMC10565430
OpenAlexW4385264941

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.