ArticleNAR cancer2023
Heterogeneity in the gene regulatory landscape of leiomyosarcoma.
Article in NAR cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pseudogene Coexpression Networks Reveal a Robust Prognostic Signature for Pediatric B-ALL Survival.Cancer research communications · 2026Article
- Patient-specific gene co-expression networks reveal novel subtypes and predictive biomarkers in lung adenocarcinoma.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025Article
- Reproducible processing of TCGA regulatory networks.GigaScience · 2025Article
- Gene co-expression network analysis reveals relationship between leukocyte fraction and genomic instability in dedifferentiated liposarcoma.Molecular biology research communications · 2025Article
- The Network Zoo: a multilingual package for the inference and analysis of gene regulatory networks.Genome biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Characterizing inter-tumor heterogeneity is crucial for selecting suitable cancer therapy, as the presence of diverse molecular subgroups of patients can be associated with disease outcome or response to treatment. While cancer subtypes are often characterized by differences in gene expression, the mechanisms driving these differences are generally unknown. We set out to model the regulatory mechanisms driving sarcoma heterogeneity based on patient-specific, genome-wide gene regulatory networks. We developed a new computational framework, PORCUPINE, which combines knowledge on biological pathways with permutation-based network analysis to identify pathways that exhibit significant regulatory heterogeneity across a patient population. We applied PORCUPINE to patient-specific leiomyosarcoma networks modeled on data from The Cancer Genome Atlas and validated our results in an independent dataset from the German Cancer Research Center. PORCUPINE identified 37 heterogeneously regulated pathways, including pathways representing potential targets for treatment of subgroups of leiomyosarcoma patients, such as FGFR and CTLA4 inhibitory signaling. We validated the detected regulatory heterogeneity through analysis of networks and chromatin states in leiomyosarcoma cell lines. We showed that the heterogeneity identified with PORCUPINE is not associated with methylation profiles or clinical features, thereby suggesting an independent mechanism of patient heterogeneity driven by the complex landscape of gene regulatory interactions.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.