Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37495247›Full record

ReviewEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2023

Regenerative and translational medicine in COPD: hype and hope.

Lucas Pires Guarnier, Lincoln Gozzi Moro, Francislaine Aparecida Dos Reis Lívero, Carolina Arruda de Faria, Mauricio Fogaça Azevedo, Beatriz Pizoni Roma, Edilson Rodrigues Albuquerque, Maria José Malagutti-Ferreira, Alessandra Gomes Duarte Rodrigues, Adelson Alves da Silva and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. PD-1Respiratory research · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Lucas Pires GuarnierDepartment of Genetics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0733-1975
Lincoln Gozzi MoroLaboratory of Genetics and Cell Therapy - GenTe Cel, Department of Biotechnology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Assis, Brazil.
Francislaine Aparecida Dos Reis LíveroLaboratory of Preclinical Research of Natural Products, Paranaense University (UNIPAR), Umuarama, Brazil.
Carolina Arruda de FariaHealth and Biotechnology Institute, Federal University of Amazonas (UFAM), Coari, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8086-1262
Mauricio Fogaça AzevedoLaboratory of Genetics and Cell Therapy - GenTe Cel, Department of Biotechnology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Assis, Brazil.
Beatriz Pizoni RomaLaboratory of Genetics and Cell Therapy - GenTe Cel, Department of Biotechnology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Assis, Brazil.
Edilson Rodrigues AlbuquerqueLaboratory of Preclinical Research of Natural Products, Paranaense University (UNIPAR), Umuarama, Brazil.
Maria José Malagutti-FerreiraLaboratory of Genetics and Cell Therapy - GenTe Cel, Department of Biotechnology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Assis, Brazil.
Alessandra Gomes Duarte RodriguesFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Western São Paulo (UNOESTE), São Paulo, Brazil.
Adelson Alves da SilvaSão Lucas Research and Education Institute (IEP - São Lucas), TechLife, São Paulo, Brazil.
Eliseo Joji SekiyaSão Lucas Research and Education Institute (IEP - São Lucas), TechLife, São Paulo, Brazil.
João Tadeu Ribeiro-PaesDepartment of Genetics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, Brazil ribeiro.paes@unesp.br.
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRFaculdade São Lucas · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Paranaense · BRUniversidade de Ribeirão Preto · BRUniversidade do Oeste Paulista · BRUniversidade Federal do Amazonas · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COPD is a common, preventable and usually progressive disease associated with an enhanced chronic inflammatory response in the airways and lung, generally caused by exposure to noxious particles and gases. It is a treatable disease characterised by persistent respiratory symptoms and airflow limitation due to abnormalities in the airways and/or alveoli. COPD is currently the third leading cause of death worldwide, representing a serious public health problem and a high social and economic burden. Despite significant advances, effective clinical treatments have not yet been achieved. In this scenario, cell-based therapies have emerged as potentially promising therapeutic approaches. However, there are only a few published studies of cell-based therapies in human patients with COPD and a small number of ongoing clinical trials registered on clinicaltrials.gov Despite the advances and interesting results, numerous doubts and questions remain about efficacy, mechanisms of action, culture conditions, doses, timing, route of administration and conditions related to homing and engraftment of the infused cells. This article presents the state of the art of cell-based therapy in COPD. Clinical trials that have already been completed and with published results are discussed in detail. We also discuss the questions that remain unanswered about cell-based regenerative and translational medicine for COPD.

Indexed as

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveHumansInflammationLungTranslational Science, Biomedical

Identifiers

PMID37495247
PMCPMC10369169
OpenAlexW4385277487

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.