ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2023
IFF: Identifying key residues in intrinsically disordered regions of proteins using machine learning.
Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rethinking bioinformatics in liquid-liquid phase separation: data resources, predictive models, and an event-centric perspective.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Evolution of intrinsically disordered regions in vertebrate galectins for phase separation.EMBO reports · 2026Article
- SHARK: web server for alignment-free homology assessment for intrinsically disordered and unalignable protein regions.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- SHARK-capture identifies functional motifs in intrinsically disordered protein regions.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025Article
- SHARK enables sensitive detection of evolutionary homologs and functional analogs in unalignable and disordered sequences.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- IFF: Identifying key residues in intrinsically disordered regions of proteins using machine learning.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conserved residues in protein homolog sequence alignments are structurally or functionally important. For intrinsically disordered proteins or proteins with intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs), however, alignment often fails because they lack a steric structure to constrain evolution. Although sequences vary, the physicochemical features of IDRs may be preserved in maintaining function. Therefore, a method to retrieve common IDR features may help identify functionally important residues. We applied unsupervised contrastive learning to train a model with self-attention neuronal networks on human IDR orthologs. Parameters in the model were trained to match sequences in ortholog pairs but not in other IDRs. The trained model successfully identifies previously reported critical residues from experimental studies, especially those with an overall pattern (e.g., multiple aromatic residues or charged blocks) rather than short motifs. This predictive model can be used to identify potentially important residues in other proteins, improving our understanding of their functions. The trained model can be run directly from the Jupyter Notebook in the GitHub repository using Binder (mybinder.org). The only required input is the primary sequence. The training scripts are available on GitHub (https://github.com/allmwh/IFF). The training datasets have been deposited in an Open Science Framework repository (https://osf.io/jk29b).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.