Evidence mapPaperPMID 37500973Full record

ArticleNature aging2023

Multi-omic rejuvenation and life span extension on exposure to youthful circulation.

Bohan Zhang, David E Lee, Alexandre Trapp, Alexander Tyshkovskiy, Ake T Lu, Akshay Bareja, Csaba Kerepesi, Lauren K McKay, Anastasia V Shindyapina, Sergey E Dmitriev and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature aging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Research progress on blood therapy for anti-aging.Journal of advanced research · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Systematic identification of single transcription factor perturbations that drive cellular and tissue rejuvenation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Bohan Zhang *Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
David E Lee *Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Alexandre Trapp *Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7938-0410
Alexander TyshkovskiyDivision of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6215-190X
Ake T LuDepartment of Human Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2866-7961
Akshay BarejaDepartment of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Csaba KerepesiDivision of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9541-246X
Lauren K McKayDuke Molecular Physiology Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Anastasia V ShindyapinaDivision of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Sergey E DmitrievBelozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1774-8475
Gurpreet S BahtDuke Molecular Physiology Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Steve HorvathDepartment of Human Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4110-3589
Vadim N GladyshevDivision of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. vgladyshev@rics.bwh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0372-7016
James P WhiteDepartment of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA. james.white@duke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2667-0806

Funding

Primary Cells, Tissues, and Animals CoreP01AG047200 · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · 2025 to 2025
$3.6M
TRANSFUSION MEDICINE AND RELATED AREAST32HL007057 · DUKE UNIVERSITY · 1985 to 2025
$1.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007057NIA NIH HHS K01 AG056664NIA NIH HHS P01 AG047200NIA NIH HHS R01 AG065403NIA NIH HHS R01 AG067782NIA NIH HHS R21 AG065943
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heterochronic parabiosis (HPB) is known for its functional rejuvenation effects across several mouse tissues. However, its impact on biological age and long-term health is unknown. Here we performed extended (3-month) HPB, followed by a 2-month detachment period of anastomosed pairs. Old detached mice exhibited improved physiological parameters and lived longer than control isochronic mice. HPB drastically reduced the epigenetic age of blood and liver based on several clock models using two independent platforms. Remarkably, this rejuvenation effect persisted even after 2 months of detachment. Transcriptomic and epigenomic profiles of anastomosed mice showed an intermediate phenotype between old and young, suggesting a global multi-omic rejuvenation effect. In addition, old HPB mice showed gene expression changes opposite to aging but akin to several life span-extending interventions. Altogether, we reveal that long-term HPB results in lasting epigenetic and transcriptome remodeling, culminating in the extension of life span and health span.

Indexed as

LongevityRejuvenationAgingAnimalsMiceMultiomics

Identifiers

PMID37500973
PMCPMC11095548

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.