ArticleBMC genomics2023
GDCL-NcDA: identifying non-coding RNA-disease associations via contrastive learning between deep graph learning and deep matrix factorization.
Article in BMC genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolving computational paradigms for noncoding variant pathogenicity prediction.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Review
- Graph attention networks-based prediction of MicroRNA-disease causality in head and neck neoplasms.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Contrastive hypergraph collaborative filtering for transfer RNA-disease association prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- SGCLDGA: unveiling drug-gene associations through simple graph contrastive learning.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Predictive modeling of stem cell suppression by inflammatory cytokine networks: A synthetic transcriptomic approach for periodontal tissue engineering.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) draw much attention from studies widely in recent years because they play vital roles in life activities. As a good complement to wet experiment methods, computational prediction methods can greatly save experimental costs. However, high false-negative data and insufficient use of multi-source information can affect the performance of computational prediction methods. Furthermore, many computational methods do not have good robustness and generalization on different datasets. In this work, we propose an effective end-to-end computing framework, called GDCL-NcDA, of deep graph learning and deep matrix factorization (DMF) with contrastive learning, which identifies the latent ncRNA-disease association on diverse multi-source heterogeneous networks (MHNs). The diverse MHNs include different similarity networks and proven associations among ncRNAs (miRNAs, circRNAs, and lncRNAs), genes, and diseases. Firstly, GDCL-NcDA employs deep graph convolutional network and multiple attention mechanisms to adaptively integrate multi-source of MHNs and reconstruct the ncRNA-disease association graph. Then, GDCL-NcDA utilizes DMF to predict the latent disease-associated ncRNAs based on the reconstructed graphs to reduce the impact of the false-negatives from the original associations. Finally, GDCL-NcDA uses contrastive learning (CL) to generate a contrastive loss on the reconstructed graphs and the predicted graphs to improve the generalization and robustness of our GDCL-NcDA framework. The experimental results show that GDCL-NcDA outperforms highly related computational methods. Moreover, case studies demonstrate the effectiveness of GDCL-NcDA in identifying the associations among diversiform ncRNAs and diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.