Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37506097›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Effect of the oil from the fatty tissues of Crocodylus siamensis on gut microbiome diversity and metabolism in mice.

Kongphop Parunyakul, Aphisara Chuchoiy, Sasiporn Kooltueon, Phiyaporn Puttagamnerd, Krittika Srisuksai, Pitchaya Santativongchai, Urai Pongchairerk, Phitsanu Tulayakul, Teerasak E-Kobon, Wirasak Fungfuang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Chinese herbal medicines · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kongphop ParunyakulFaculty of Science, Department of Zoology, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Aphisara ChuchoiyFaculty of Science, Department of Zoology, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sasiporn KooltueonFaculty of Science, Department of Zoology, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Phiyaporn PuttagamnerdFaculty of Science, Department of Zoology, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Krittika SrisuksaiFaculty of Science, Department of Zoology, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pitchaya SantativongchaiFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Bio-Veterinary Sciences (International Program), Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-9905-3019
Urai PongchairerkFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Anatomy, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Phitsanu TulayakulFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Public Health, Kasetsart University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Teerasak E-KobonFaculty of Science, Department of Genetics, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Wirasak FungfuangFaculty of Science, Department of Zoology, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-6689-2804
Kasetsart University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dietary fat can alter host metabolism and gut microbial composition. Crocodile oil (CO) was extracted from the fatty tissues of Crocodylus siamensis. CO, rich in monounsaturated- and polyunsaturated fatty acids, has been reported to reduce inflammation, counter toxification, and improve energy metabolism. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of CO on gut microbiota (GM) in laboratory mice as well as the accompanying metabolic changes in the animals. Forty-five C57BL/6 male mice were randomly divided into five groups and orally administrated either sterile water (control [C]); 1 or 3% (v/w) CO (CO-low [CO-L] and CO-high [CO-H], respectively); or 1 or 3% (v/w) palm oil (PO-low and PO-high, respectively) for 11 weeks. Body weight gain, food intake, energy intake, blood glucose levels, and blood lipid profiles were determined. Samples from colon tissue were collected and the 16S rRNA genes were pyrosequenced to clarify GM analyses. The results showed that there were no differences in body weight and blood glucose levels. Food intake by the mice in the CO-L and CO-H groups was statistically significantly less when compared to that by the animals in the C group. However, neither CO treatment had a statistically significant effect on calorie intake when compared to the controls. The CO-H exhibited a significant increase in serum total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein but showed a downward trend in triglyceride levels compared to the control. The GM analyses revealed that both CO treatments have no significant influence on bacterial diversity and relative abundance at the phylum level, whereas increases of Choa1 and abundance-based coverage estimator indexes, distinct β-diversity, and Proteobacteria abundance were observed in the PO-high group compared with the C group. Furthermore, the abundance of Azospirillum thiophilum and Romboutsia ilealis was significantly higher in the CO-L and CO-H groups which could be associated with energy metabolic activity. Thus, CO may be an alternative fat source for preserving host metabolism and gut flora.

Indexed as

Alligators and CrocodilesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsBlood GlucoseBody WeightDiet, High-FatLipid MetabolismMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBlood GlucoseRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID37506097
PMCPMC10381048
OpenAlexW4385336259

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.