Observational studyIntensive care medicine2023
Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein to rule out early bacterial coinfection in COVID-19 critically ill patients.
Observational study in Intensive care medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- A clinical scoring system for the early identification of superinfections in patients with severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome: An ambispective multicentre cohort study.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Age-Structured Clinical Background Is More Strongly Associated with C-Reactive Protein Levels than Individual Respiratory Viruses During Respiratory Virus Testing.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Procalcitonin Levels in ICU Patients with SARS-CoV-2-Associated Viral Sepsis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- The Resistance Paradox in COVID-19 Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Retrospective Study on Rapid Molecular Stewardship.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparing routine hematological parameters on COVID-19, bacterial infections, and coinfection in elderly severe community-acquired pneumonia, a retrospective study in primary hospitals.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026Article
- Combined predictive accuracy of inflammatory and hematologic indicators for urinary tract-related bloodstream infection.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a predictive model for ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients with cardiogenic shock: based on the MIMIC-IV database.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Predictive Performance of SAPS-3, SOFA Score, and Procalcitonin for Hospital Mortality in COVID-19 Viral Sepsis: A Cohort Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A novel nomogram for the early identification of coinfections in elderly patients with coronavirus disease 2019.Virology journal · 2025Observational
- Does Empirical Antibiotic Use Improve Outcomes in Ventilated Patients with Pandemic Viral Infection? A Multicentre Retrospective Study.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Development of a risk prediction model for secondary infection in severe/critical COVID-19 patients.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Early Predictive Value of Infectious Markers for Ventilator-associated Pneumonia after Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection Surgery.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Role of Artificial Intelligence in Identifying Vital Biomarkers with Greater Precision in Emergency Departments During Emerging Pandemics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Presepsin is a biomarker that can predict mortality in sepsis patients.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2025Article
- Clinical characteristics and predictive models for hospitalized patients with COVID-19 combined with bacterial pneumonia.PloS one · 2025Article
- Dual threat: Susceptibility mechanisms and treatment strategies for COVID-19 and bacterial co-infections.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Review
- The Influence of COVID-19 on Antimicrobial Resistance Trends at a Secondary Care Hospital in Slovenia: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Enhancing sepsis biomarker development: key considerations from public and private perspectives.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Review
- The long Pentraxin PTX3 serves as an early predictive biomarker of co-infections in COVID-19.EBioMedicine · 2024Article
- Comparative Impact of an Optimized PK/PD Target Attainment of Piperacillin-Tazobactam vs. Meropenem on the Trend over Time of SOFA Score and Inflammatory Biomarkers in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Continuous Infusion Monotherapy for Treating Documented Gram-Negative BSIs and/or VAP.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
74 authors at 20 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAlthough the prevalence of community-acquired respiratory bacterial coinfection upon hospital admission in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been reported to be < 5%, almost three-quarters of patients received antibiotics. We aim to investigate whether procalcitonin (PCT) or C-reactive protein (CRP) upon admission could be helpful biomarkers to identify bacterial coinfection among patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.
methodsWe carried out a multicentre, observational cohort study including consecutive COVID-19 patients admitted to 55 Spanish intensive care units (ICUs). The primary outcome was to explore whether PCT or CRP serum levels upon hospital admission could predict bacterial coinfection among patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. The secondary outcome was the evaluation of their association with mortality. We also conducted subgroups analyses in higher risk profile populations.
resultsBetween 5 February 2020 and 21 December 2021, 4076 patients were included, 133 (3%) of whom presented bacterial coinfection. PCT and CRP had low area under curve (AUC) scores at the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis [0.57 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51-0.61) and 0.6 (95% CI, 0.55-0.64), respectively], but high negative predictive values (NPV) [97.5% (95% CI 96.5-98.5) and 98.2% (95% CI 97.5-98.9) for PCT and CRP, respectively]. CRP alone was associated with bacterial coinfection (OR 2, 95% CI 1.25-3.19; p = 0.004). The overall 15, 30 and 90 days mortality had a higher trend in the bacterial coinfection group, but without significant difference. PCT ≥ 0.12 ng/mL was associated with higher 90 days mortality.
conclusionOur study suggests that measurements of PCT and CRP, alone and at a single time point, are not useful for ruling in or out bacterial coinfection in viral pneumonia by COVID-19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.