Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37509642›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2023

Prognostic Significance of PD-L1 Expression in Gastric Cancer Patients with Peritoneal Metastasis.

Xiao-Jiang Chen, Cheng-Zhi Wei, Jun Lin, Ruo-Peng Zhang, Guo-Ming Chen, Yuan-Fang Li, Run-Cong Nie, Yong-Ming Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Real-world characterization of PD-L1 expression in patients with advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma in Spain.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xiao-Jiang ChenState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of Gastric Surgery, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, No.651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1920-2222
Cheng-Zhi WeiState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of Gastric Surgery, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, No.651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Jun LinState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of Gastric Surgery, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, No.651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Ruo-Peng ZhangState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of Gastric Surgery, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, No.651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Guo-Ming ChenState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of Gastric Surgery, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, No.651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Yuan-Fang LiState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of Gastric Surgery, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, No.651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Run-Cong NieState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of Gastric Surgery, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, No.651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Yong-Ming ChenState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of Gastric Surgery, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, No.651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, China.

Funding

People's Government of Guangdong Province (2023A1515012705, 2021A1515110394)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecently, many studies have explored the relationship between the expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and prognosis in gastric cancer, but there is still controversy. Additionally, few studies have specifically investigated the expression of PD-L1 in patients with peritoneal metastasis.

methodsImmunohistochemistry was used to analyze the expression of PD-L1 in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis. The combined positive score (CPS) was calculated to evaluate the expression of PD-L1, and the clinicopathological data were analyzed to explore prognostic significance.

resultsIn total, 147 gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis were enrolled. The negative PD-L1 expression was defined as a CPS < 1, and high PD-L1 expression was defined as a CPS ≥ 10. PD-L1 expression with CPS ≥ 1 and CPS-negative was detected in 67 (45.58%) and 80 (54.42%) patients, respectively. High PD-L1 expression at PD-L1 CPS ≥ 10 was detected in 21(14.29%) patients. The median overall survival (OS) was 18.53 months in the CPS < 10 group and 27.00 months in the CPS ≥ 10 group; the OS difference between the two groups was significant (

conclusionsOur study demonstrated that PD-L1 expression was widely presented in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis, while a CPS no less than 10 predicted better prognosis.

Indexed as

gastric cancerPD-L1peritoneal metastasisprognosis

Identifiers

PMID37509642
PMCPMC10377298

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.