Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37510560›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Metabolic Syndrome and Associated Factors in Farmers in Southeastern Brazil: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Ana Clara Petersen Cremonini, Júlia Rabelo Santos Ferreira, Cleodice Alves Martins, Camila Bruneli do Prado, Glenda Blaser Petarli, Monica Cattafesta, Luciane Bresciani Salaroli

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ana Clara Petersen CremoniniHealth Sciences Center, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitoria 29043900, Brazil.
Júlia Rabelo Santos FerreiraGraduate Program Collective Health, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitoria 29043900, Brazil.
Cleodice Alves MartinsGraduate Program Collective Health, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitoria 29043900, Brazil.
Camila Bruneli do PradoGraduate Program Collective Health, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitoria 29043900, Brazil.
Glenda Blaser PetarliGraduate Program Collective Health, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitoria 29043900, Brazil.
Monica CattafestaGraduate Program Collective Health, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitoria 29043900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8973-622X
Luciane Bresciani SalaroliGraduate Program Collective Health, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitoria 29043900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1881-0306
Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Metabolic syndrome is a strong predictor of cardiovascular disease thus the objective of the study was to verify the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in farmers, as well as to verify the association with sociodemographic, work and lifestyle factors. (2) Methods: Cross-sectional, observational study, conducted with 790 individuals. For the diagnosis of metabolic syndrome, the National Cholesterol Education Program's Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP-ATP III) and International Diabetes Federation (IDF) criteria were used. Pearson's chi-square test and binary logistic regression were used to verify factors associated with metabolic syndrome (3) Results: The prevalence of MS according to the IDF criteria was 16.3% overall, with 9.7% of women (95% CI: 6.66-16.16) and 6.6% of men (95% CI: 5.17-11.97). According to the NCEP/ATP III criterion, it was 12.3% overall, with 7.5% corresponding to women (95% CI: 6.62-13.13) and 4.8% to men (95% CI: 3.5-8.70). With regard to the conditions that make up metabolic syndrome, it was found that high density lipoprotein, high blood pressure and high waist circumference were the most prevalent. (4) Conclusions: The prevalence of metabolic syndrome is considerable in the population when compared to other regions, both rural and urban, in Brazil.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusMetabolic SyndromeAdenosine TriphosphateAdultBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFarmersFemaleHumansMalePrevalenceRisk FactorsAdenosine Triphosphatefarmersmetabolic syndromerural population

Identifiers

PMID37510560
PMCPMC10379224
OpenAlexW4383819588

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.