Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37510783›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023

Prospects for Precision Medicine in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Patient-Level Insights into Myocardial Injury and Repair.

Mohammad Alkhalil, Giovanni Luigi De Maria, Naveed Akbar, Neil Ruparelia, Robin P Choudhury

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mohammad AlkhalilCardiothoracic Centre, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE7 7DN, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3088-8878
Giovanni Luigi De MariaCardiology Department, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3572-1855
Naveed AkbarDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4620-6373
Neil RupareliaCardiology Department, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London W12 0HS, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3968-2750
Robin P ChoudhuryDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
John Radcliffe Hospital · GBFreeman Hospital · GBHammersmith Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The past decade has seen a marked expansion in the understanding of the pathobiology of acute myocardial infarction and the systemic inflammatory response that it elicits. At the same time, a portfolio of tools has emerged to characterise some of these processes in vivo. However, in clinical practice, key decision making still largely relies on assessment built around the timing of the onset of chest pain, features on electrocardiograms and measurements of plasma troponin. Better understanding the heterogeneity of myocardial injury and patient-level responses should provide new opportunities for diagnostic stratification to enable the delivery of more rational therapies. Characterisation of the myocardium using emerging imaging techniques such as the T1, T2 and T2* mapping techniques can provide enhanced assessments of myocardial statuses. Physiological measures, which include microcirculatory resistance and coronary flow reserve, have been shown to predict outcomes in AMI and can be used to inform treatment selection. Functionally informative blood biomarkers, including cellular transcriptomics; microRNAs; extracellular vesicle analyses and soluble markers, all give insights into the nature and timing of the innate immune response and its regulation in acute MI. The integration of these and other emerging tools will be key to developing a fuller understanding of the patient-level processes of myocardial injury and repair and should fuel new possibilities for rational therapeutic intervention.

Indexed as

coronary physiologyinflammationMRImyocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID37510783
PMCPMC10380764
OpenAlexW4384340996

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.