ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023
Prospects for Precision Medicine in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Patient-Level Insights into Myocardial Injury and Repair.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rationale and Design of a Randomised Proof-of-Concept Trial to Assess the Safety of Early Discharge Using Index Microcirculatory Resistance in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: SECURE Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury after acute myocardial infarction: spatiotemporal mechanisms and endotype-matched multi-target modulation by compounds from traditional Chinese medicine.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Thrombectomy in acute myocardial infarction: Current evidence, challenges, and emerging technologies.World journal of clinical cases · 2025Review
- Article
- A Meta-Analysis of Timing of Complete Revascularization in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- The Use of Thrombectomy during Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Resurrecting an Old Concept in Contemporary Practice.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- One-Year Prognosis Difference of Myocardial Infarction With or Without Coronary Obstruction in Developing Countries: Insights From the Moroccan Experience.Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology · 2024Article
- Microvascular Obstruction in Acute Myocardial Infarction, a Potential Therapeutic Target.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The past decade has seen a marked expansion in the understanding of the pathobiology of acute myocardial infarction and the systemic inflammatory response that it elicits. At the same time, a portfolio of tools has emerged to characterise some of these processes in vivo. However, in clinical practice, key decision making still largely relies on assessment built around the timing of the onset of chest pain, features on electrocardiograms and measurements of plasma troponin. Better understanding the heterogeneity of myocardial injury and patient-level responses should provide new opportunities for diagnostic stratification to enable the delivery of more rational therapies. Characterisation of the myocardium using emerging imaging techniques such as the T1, T2 and T2* mapping techniques can provide enhanced assessments of myocardial statuses. Physiological measures, which include microcirculatory resistance and coronary flow reserve, have been shown to predict outcomes in AMI and can be used to inform treatment selection. Functionally informative blood biomarkers, including cellular transcriptomics; microRNAs; extracellular vesicle analyses and soluble markers, all give insights into the nature and timing of the innate immune response and its regulation in acute MI. The integration of these and other emerging tools will be key to developing a fuller understanding of the patient-level processes of myocardial injury and repair and should fuel new possibilities for rational therapeutic intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.