Evidence mapPaperPMID 37511115Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Circulating miRNAs as a Tool for Early Diagnosis of Endometrial Cancer-Implications for the Fertility-Sparing Process: Clinical, Biological, and Legal Aspects.

Roberto Piergentili, Giuseppe Gullo, Giuseppe Basile, Caterina Gulia, Alessandro Porrello, Gaspare Cucinella, Enrico Marinelli, Simona Zaami

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The newly enacted Italian surrogacy law: Effects on reproductive tourism.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Roberto PiergentiliIstituto di Biologia e Patologia Molecolari del CNR (IBPM-CNR), 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7584-2171
Giuseppe GulloDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Villa Sofia Cervello Hospital, IVF UNIT, University of Palermo, 90146 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4269-4269
Giuseppe BasileIRCCS Orthopedic Institute Galeazzi, 20161 Milan, Italy.
Caterina GuliaDipartimento di Urologia, Ospedale della Misericordia, 58100 Grosseto, Italy.
Alessandro PorrelloLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center & RNA Discovery Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Gaspare CucinellaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Villa Sofia Cervello Hospital, IVF UNIT, University of Palermo, 90146 Palermo, Italy.
Enrico MarinelliDepartment of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7104-8744
Simona ZaamiDepartment of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopedic Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5741-7139

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review article explores the possibility of developing an integrated approach to the management of the different needs of endometrial cancer (EC) patients seeking to become pregnant. Life preservation of the woman, health preservation of the baby, a precocious and-as much as possible-minimally invasive characterization of the health and fertility parameters of the patient, together with the concerns regarding the obstetric, neonatal, and adult health risks of the children conceived via assisted reproductive techniques (ART) are all essential aspects of the problem to be taken into consideration, yet the possibility to harmonize such needs through a concerted and integrated approach is still very challenging. This review aims to illustrate the main features of EC and how it affects the normal physiology of pre-menopausal women. We also focus on the prospect of a miR-based, molecular evaluation of patient health status, including both EC early diagnosis and staging and, similarly, the receptivity of the woman, discussing the possible evaluation of both aspects using a single specific panel of circulating miRs in the patient, thus allowing a relatively fast, non-invasive testing with a significantly reduced margin of error. Finally, the ethical and legal/regulatory aspects of such innovative techniques require not only a risk-benefit analysis; respect for patient autonomy and equitable health care access allocation are fundamental issues as well.

Indexed as

Endometrial NeoplasmsMicroRNAsAdultChildEarly Detection of CancerFemaleFertilityHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyReproductive Techniques, AssistedMicroRNAsassisted reproductive techniques (ART)endometrial cancer (EC)ethical and legal implicationsmiR-basedmolecular evaluation

Identifiers

PMID37511115
PMCPMC10379073

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.