Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37511478›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy in Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review.

Rodrigo Montoto-Meijide, Rosa Meijide-Faílde, Silvia María Díaz-Prado, Antonio Montoto-Marqués

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Stem cell therapy for peripheral nerve injury: illustrative cases.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rodrigo Montoto-MeijideComplejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0009-0003-5004-4474
Rosa Meijide-FaíldeGrupo de Investigación en Terapia Celular y Medicina Regenerativa, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña (INIBIC), Centro Interdisciplinar de Química y Biología (CICA), Universidade da Coruña, 15071 A Coruña, Spain.
Silvia María Díaz-PradoGrupo de Investigación en Terapia Celular y Medicina Regenerativa, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña (INIBIC), Centro Interdisciplinar de Química y Biología (CICA), Universidade da Coruña, 15071 A Coruña, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9776-2180
Antonio Montoto-MarquésDepartamento de Fisioterapia, Medicina y Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidade da Coruña, 15071 A Coruña, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1773-365X
Universidade da Coruña · ESComplejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago · ES

Funding

Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI20/00933
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recovery from a traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) is challenging due to the limited regenerative capacity of the central nervous system to restore cells, myelin, and neural connections. Cell therapy, particularly with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), holds significant promise for TSCI treatment. This systematic review aims to analyze the efficacy, safety, and therapeutic potential of MSC-based cell therapies in TSCI. A comprehensive search of PUBMED and COCHRANE databases until February 2023 was conducted, combining terms such as "spinal cord injury," "stem cells," "stem cell therapy," "mesenchymal stem cells," and "traumatic spinal cord injury". Among the 53 studies initially identified, 22 (21 clinical trials and 1 case series) were included. Findings from these studies consistently demonstrate improvements in AIS (ASIA Impairment Scale) grades, sensory scores, and, to a lesser extent, motor scores. Meta-analyses further support these positive outcomes. MSC-based therapies have shown short- and medium-term safety, as indicated by the absence of significant adverse events within the studied timeframe. However, caution is required when drawing generalized recommendations due to the limited scientific evidence available. Further research is needed to elucidate the long-term safety and clinical implications of these advancements. Although significant progress has been made, particularly with MSC-based therapies, additional studies exploring other potential future therapies such as gene therapies, neurostimulation techniques, and tissue engineering approaches are essential for a comprehensive understanding of the evolving TSCI treatment landscape.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationSpinal Cord InjuriesCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyHumansMyelin SheathSpinal Cordcell therapymesenchymal stem cellstraumatic spinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID37511478
PMCPMC10380897
OpenAlexW4384942253

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.