Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37511883›Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2023

What Is the Best Treatment of the Femoral Shaft Nonunion after Intramedullary Nailing? A Systematic Review.

Luca Bianco Prevot, Alessandra Nannini, Laura Mangiavini, Andrea Bobba, Sara Buzzi, Federico Sinigaglia, Giuseppe Peretti

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. What is the rate and degree of deformity in femoral diaphyseal nonunion? A CT-based retrospective cohort study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Peri-implant femoral fractures in elderly: Morbidity, mortality, treatment options and good practices.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Luca Bianco PrevotIRCCS Galeazzi-S. Ambrogio Institute, EUORR University Equip of Regenerative and Reconstructive Orthopedics, Via Cristina Belgioioso 173, 20157 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9093-6309
Alessandra NanniniIRCCS Galeazzi-S. Ambrogio Institute, EUORR University Equip of Regenerative and Reconstructive Orthopedics, Via Cristina Belgioioso 173, 20157 Milan, Italy.
Laura MangiaviniIRCCS Galeazzi-S. Ambrogio Institute, EUORR University Equip of Regenerative and Reconstructive Orthopedics, Via Cristina Belgioioso 173, 20157 Milan, Italy.
Andrea BobbaIRCCS Galeazzi-S. Ambrogio Institute, EUORR University Equip of Regenerative and Reconstructive Orthopedics, Via Cristina Belgioioso 173, 20157 Milan, Italy.
Sara BuzziIRCCS Galeazzi-S. Ambrogio Institute, EUORR University Equip of Regenerative and Reconstructive Orthopedics, Via Cristina Belgioioso 173, 20157 Milan, Italy.
Federico SinigagliaIRCCS Galeazzi-S. Ambrogio Institute, EUORR University Equip of Regenerative and Reconstructive Orthopedics, Via Cristina Belgioioso 173, 20157 Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe PerettiIRCCS Galeazzi-S. Ambrogio Institute, EUORR University Equip of Regenerative and Reconstructive Orthopedics, Via Cristina Belgioioso 173, 20157 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9341-7187

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nonunion (NU) is one of the most feared complications of femoral shaft fracture treatment. Femoral shaft fracture treatment is often linked with poor bone stock and reduced bone metabolism. In this paper, the goal is to carefully analyze the best treatment options for patients who developed nonunion after the intramedullary nailing of a femoral shaft fracture. A systematic review of the literature available in the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochran library databases was carried out, and 16 studies were included. Exclusion criteria included case reports and case series that do not have data about clinical outcomes or functional outcomes and included fewer than 10 patients. The reviewed data provide evidence for very good results about the treatment of this pathology with exchanging intramedullary nails or the implantation of a plate and screws (general healing rate of 96.3%). Moreover, the data support the utilization of autologous bone graft in order to stimulate the healing process. In conclusion, the choice between these two types of treatment must be guided by the type of pseudarthrosis that the patient presents. Additionally, bone grafting or growth factors promote bone regenerative processes, especially in patients with oligo-atrophic pseudoarthrosis.

Indexed as

bone graftfemoral shaft fracturesintramedullary nailingnonunionpseudarthrosis

Identifiers

PMID37511883
PMCPMC10381168
OpenAlexW4383226767

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.