Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37512249›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Comparative Analysis of Vegetable and Mineral Oil-Based Antiadhesive/Hydrophobic Liquids and Their Impact on Wood Properties.

Magdalena Kachel, Anna Krawczuk, Marta Krajewska, Stanisław Parafiniuk, Tomasz Guz, Klaudia Rząd, Arkadiusz Matwijczuk

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Magdalena KachelDepartment of Machinery Exploitation and Management of Production Processes, Faculty of Production Engineering, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 28 Głęboka St., 20-612 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0595-9718
Anna KrawczukDepartment of Machinery Exploitation and Management of Production Processes, Faculty of Production Engineering, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 28 Głęboka St., 20-612 Lublin, Poland.
Marta KrajewskaDepartment of Biological Bases of Food and Feed Technologies, Faculty of Production Engineering, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 20-612 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7459-7389
Stanisław ParafiniukDepartment of Machinery Exploitation and Management of Production Processes, Faculty of Production Engineering, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 28 Głęboka St., 20-612 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8566-6527
Tomasz GuzDepartment of Food Engineering and Machinery, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 20-612 Lublin, Poland.
Klaudia RządDepartment of Biophysics, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland.
Arkadiusz MatwijczukDepartment of Biophysics, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2630-120X
University of Life Sciences in Lublin · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The unavailability of biodegradable preservatives is one of the major setbacks in the construction industry. With this in mind, our study focused on the analysis and comparison of two hydrophobic liquids, one vegetable oil-based (VOA) and the other mineral oil-based (MOA), and subsequently applying the same on three types of wood. The comparison of the vegetable oil-based (VOA) and mineral oil-based (MOA)

Indexed as

biodegradationFTIR spectroscopyhydrophobic liquidsmineral oilsraw woodvegetable oils

Identifiers

PMID37512249
PMCPMC10381716
OpenAlexW4384202694

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.