ReviewMicromachines2023
A Comprehensive Review of In-Body Biomedical Antennas: Design, Challenges and Applications.
Review in Micromachines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Framework for Short-Range Wireless Power and Data Transfer in Miniaturized High-Power, High-Bandwidth Implants.Micromachines · 2026Review
- A Resonator-Based Flexible Antenna for Non-Invasive Deep Brain Temperature Sensing with Microwave Radiometry.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Next-Generation Biomedical Microwave Antennas: Metamaterial Design and Advanced Printing Manufacturing Techniques.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Design and Analysis of a Dual-Band Implantable Receiving Antenna for Wireless Power Transfer and Data Communication at 1.32 GHz and 2.58 GHz.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Implantable antenna for biomedical applications: electromagnetic, SAR, and thermal performance evaluation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Safety and Effectiveness of Triple-Antenna Hepatic Microwave Ablation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Miniaturized circularly polarized wearable array antenna for medical device applications.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In-body biomedical devices (IBBDs) are receiving significant attention in the discovery of solutions to complex medical conditions. Biomedical devices, which can be ingested, injected or implanted in the human body, have made it viable to screen the physiological signs of a patient wirelessly, without regular hospital appointments and routine check-ups, where the antenna is a mandatory element for transferring bio-data from the IBBDs to the external world. However, the design of an in-body antenna is challenging due to the dispersion of the dielectric constant of the tissues and unpredictability of the organ structures of the human body, which can absorb most of the antenna radiation. Therefore, various factors must be considered for an in-body antenna, such as miniaturization, link budget, patient safety, biocompatibility, low power consumption and the ability to work effectively within acceptable medical frequency bands. This paper presents a comprehensive overview of the major facets associated with the design and challenges of in-body antennas. The review comprises surveying the design specifications and implementation methodology, simulation software and testing of in-body biomedical antennas. This work aims to summarize the recent in-body antenna innovations for biomedical applications and indicates the key research challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.