Evidence mapPaperPMID 37513494Full record

SynthesisNutrients2023

Effects of Insect Consumption on Human Health: A Systematic Review of Human Studies.

Nair Cunha, Vanda Andrade, Paula Ruivo, Paula Pinto

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nair CunhaEscola Superior Agraria, Instituto Politécnico de Santarém, 2001-904 Santarém, Portugal.
Vanda AndradeEscola Superior Agraria, Instituto Politécnico de Santarém, 2001-904 Santarém, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-1879-8554
Paula RuivoEscola Superior Agraria, Instituto Politécnico de Santarém, 2001-904 Santarém, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-6868-2894
Paula PintoEscola Superior Agraria, Instituto Politécnico de Santarém, 2001-904 Santarém, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-6379-1768

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDP/04748/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insects have been consumed as food in diverse cultures worldwide, gaining recognition as a sustainable and nutritious food source. This systematic review aims to update information on the impact of insect consumption on human health based on human randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and allergenicity assessment studies. Following PRISMA guidelines, studies published in the last 10 years were analyzed. From one-thousand and sixty-three retrieved references, nine RCTs and five allergenicity studies were analyzed. Post-prandial amino acid levels increased after insect protein consumption. In comparison with other protein sources, insect protein showed no significant differences in the area under the curve (AUC) values for essential amino acids but tended to have lower peaks and peak later. In terms of muscle protein synthesis, there were no significant differences between insect protein and other protein sources. Glucose levels did not differ; however, insulin levels were lower after the consumption of insect-based products. The effects on inflammatory markers and microbiota composition were inconclusive and the studies did not show significant effects on appetite regulation. Allergenicity assessments revealed a sensitisation and cross-reactivity between insect allergens and known allergens. A partial reduction of cross-allergenicity was observed via thermal processing. Insect protein is an adequate protein source with promising health benefits; however, further research is needed to fully understand its potential and optimise its inclusion into the human diet.

Indexed as

FoodInsectaAllergensAnimalsDietHumansInsect ProteinsAllergensInsect Proteinsallergyamino acid absorptionbiomarkerscricketprotein synthesissatietyworm

Identifiers

PMID37513494
PMCPMC10386438

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.