Evidence mapPaperPMID 37513657Full record

SynthesisNutrients2023

The Effect of Probiotic Supplementation on Glucolipid Metabolism in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Rui Xiao, Linlin Wang, Peijun Tian, Xing Jin, Jianxin Zhao, Hao Zhang, Gang Wang, Minmin Zhu

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Probiotics,Metabolism open · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rui XiaoState Key Laboratory of Food Science and Resources, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China.
Linlin WangState Key Laboratory of Food Science and Resources, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China.
Peijun TianState Key Laboratory of Food Science and Resources, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China.
Xing JinState Key Laboratory of Food Science and Resources, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China.
Jianxin ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Food Science and Resources, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China.
Hao ZhangState Key Laboratory of Food Science and Resources, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China.
Gang WangState Key Laboratory of Food Science and Resources, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China.
Minmin ZhuDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Jiangnan University Medical Center, Wuxi 214002, China.
State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology · CNJiangnan University · CN

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities JUSRP22006, JUSRP51501National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 31972052, 32021005, 31820103010Wuxi key medical discipline construction program from Wuxi Health Commission--Innovation Team of Anesthesiology CXTD2021017,2021-2025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeType 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a persistent metabolic condition with an unknown pathophysiology. Moreover, T2DM remains a serious health risk despite advances in medication and preventive care. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have provided evidence that probiotics may have positive effects on glucolipid metabolism. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis of RCTs to measure the effect of probiotic therapy on glucolipid metabolism in patients with T2DM.

methodsWith no constraints on the language used in the literature, Excerpta Medica Database, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science were searched for pertinent RCTs published between the date of creation and 18 August 2022. Stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied by two reviewers to independently examine the literature. The risk of bias associated with the inclusion of the original studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, and Stata 15.0 was used to perform the meta-analysis.

resultsThirty-seven publications containing a total of 2502 research participants were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that after a probiotic intervention, the experimental group showed a significant decrease in body mass index (standardised mean difference (SMD) = -0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) [-0.76, -0.08]), fasting glucose concentration (SMD = -0.73, 95% CI [-0.97, -0.48]), fasting insulin concentration (SMD = -0.67, 95% CI [-0.99, -0.36]), glycated haemoglobin concentration (SMD = -0.55, 95% CI [-0.75, -0.35]), Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance score (SMD = -0.88, 95% CI [-1.17, -0.59]), triglyceride concentration (SMD = -0.30, 95% CI [-0.43, -0.17]), total cholesterol concentration (SMD = -0.27, 95% CI [-0.43, -0.11]), and low-density lipoprotein concentration (SMD = -0.20, 95% CI [-0.37, -0.04]), and an increase in high-density lipoprotein concentration (SMD = 0.31, 95% CI [0.08, 0.54]). Moreover, subgroup analyses showed that patients with a longer intervention time, or those who were treated with multiple strains of probiotics, may benefit more than those with a shorter intervention time or those who were treated with a single probiotic strain, respectively.

conclusionProbiotic supplementation improves glucolipid metabolism in patients with T2DM, offering an alternative approach for the treatment of these patients.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2ProbioticsFastingGlycated HemoglobinHumansInsulinGlycated HemoglobinInsulinglucolipid metabolismprobioticsrandomised controlled trialtype 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID37513657
PMCPMC10383415
OpenAlexW4385202608

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.