ArticleVaccines2023
Artificial Intelligence and Public Health: Evaluating ChatGPT Responses to Vaccination Myths and Misconceptions.
Article in Vaccines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Generative AI and health misinformation: production, propagation, and mitigation-a systematic review.BMC public health · 2026Pooled it
- Large Language Models for Chatbot Health Advice Studies: A Systematic Review.JAMA network open · 2025Pooled it
- Can ChatGPT provide reliable guidance to families of children with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy? A dual perspective of parents and experts.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Navigating Diabetes Management in the Digital Era: Scoping Review of Online Health Information-Seeking Behavior.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Evaluating large language models on multilingual vaccine knowledge: a benchmark study.NPJ vaccines · 2026Article
- Preliminary Evaluation of Large Language Models in Kennedy Classification and Removable Partial Denture Planning: An In Silico Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
- Compare the features of several mainstream AI software programmes: explore their accuracy and repeatability in solving queries related to pancreatic cysts.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Empowering Informal Caregivers of Persons With Early-Stage Dementia by Large Language Models: Mixed Methods Evaluation.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Public Health Education: A Scoping Review of Workforce Competency Development.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Applications of artificial intelligence in tooth extraction: A systematic review.Journal of dental sciences · 2026Review
- Assessment of vaccine information accuracy across large language models.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- AI Health Literacy: a reflective framework for LLM-based generative AI in public health education and promotion.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Large Language model (LLM) in temporomandibular disorder education: a comparative study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Evaluating ChatGPT's responses to vaccine-related questions: the impact of question framing on content and quality.Translational pediatrics · 2025Article
- Evaluating the performance of AI chatbots in responding to dental implant FAQs: A comparative study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Effectiveness, Usability, and Acceptability of ChatGPT With Retrieval-Augmented Generation (SIV-ChatGPT) in Increasing Seasonal Influenza Vaccination Uptake Among Older Adults: Quasi-Experimental Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Observational
- Assessing the accuracy, repeatability, and consistency of ChatGPT 4o in treatment planning for tooth-supported fixed prostheses: a comparative analysis of simple and complex clinical cases.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the accuracy of ChatGPT-4 and Gemini's responses to the World Dental Federation's frequently asked questions on oral health.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Assessing the accuracy and explainability of using ChatGPT to evaluate the quality of health news.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Is there any room for ChatGPT AI bot in speech-language pathology?European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) tools, such as ChatGPT, are the subject of intense debate regarding their possible applications in contexts such as health care. This study evaluates the Correctness, Clarity, and Exhaustiveness of the answers provided by ChatGPT on the topic of vaccination. The World Health Organization's 11 "myths and misconceptions" about vaccinations were administered to both the free (GPT-3.5) and paid version (GPT-4.0) of ChatGPT. The AI tool's responses were evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively, in reference to those myth and misconceptions provided by WHO, independently by two expert Raters. The agreement between the Raters was significant for both versions (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.