Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37516890›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2023

Alzheimer's polygenic risk scores, APOE, Alzheimer's disease risk, and dementia-related blood biomarker levels in a population-based cohort study followed over 17 years.

Hannah Stocker, Kira Trares, Léon Beyer, Laura Perna, Dan Rujescu, Bernd Holleczek, Konrad Beyreuther, Klaus Gerwert, Ben Schöttker, Hermann Brenner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Multi-domain AD risk burden and plasma biomarkers in cognitively unimpaired adults.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Genetic risk in Alzheimer's disease.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Polygenic score integrating neurodegenerative and vascular risk informs dementia risk stratification.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hannah StockerNetwork Aging Research, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany. h.stocker@dkfz-heidelberg.de.
Kira TraresDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Léon BeyerCenter for Protein Diagnostics (ProDi), Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Laura PernaDepartment of Translational Research in Psychiatry, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany.
Dan RujescuDepartment of Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Bernd HolleczekSaarland Cancer Registry, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Konrad BeyreutherNetwork Aging Research, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Klaus GerwertCenter for Protein Diagnostics (ProDi), Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Ben SchöttkerNetwork Aging Research, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Hermann BrennerNetwork Aging Research, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn order to utilize polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for Alzheimer's disease (AD) in a meaningful way, influential factors (i.e. training set) and prediction across groups such as APOE e4 (APOE4) genotype as well as associations to dementia-related biomarkers should be explored. Therefore, we examined the association of APOE4 and various PRSs, based on training sets that utilized differing AD definitions, with incident AD and all-cause dementia (ACD) within 17 years, and with levels of phosphorylated tau181 (P-tau181), neurofilament light (NfL), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in blood. Secondarily, effect modification by APOE4 status and sex was examined.

methodsIn this prospective, population-based cohort study and nested case-control study, 9,940 participants in Germany were enrolled between 2000 and 2002 by their general practitioners and followed for up to 17 years. Participants were included in this study if dementia status and genetic data were available. A subsample of participants additionally had measurements of P-tau181, NfL, and GFAP obtained from blood samples. Cox and logistic regression analyses were used to assess the association of genetic risk (APOE genotype and PRS

resultsFive thousand seven hundred sixty-five participants (54% female, aged 50-75years at baseline) were included in this study, of whom 464 received an all-cause dementia diagnosis within 17 years. The PRSs were not more predictive of dementia than APOE4. An APOE4 specific relationship was apparent with PRSs only exhibiting associations to dementia among APOE4 carriers. In the nested case-control study including biomarkers (n = 712), APOE4 status and polygenic risk were significantly associated to levels of GFAP in blood.

conclusionsThe use of PRSs may be beneficial for increased precision in risk estimates among APOE4 carriers. While APOE4 may play a crucial etiological role in initial disease processes such as Aβ deposition, the PRS may be an indicator of further disease drivers as well as astrocyte activation. Further research is necessary to confirm these findings, especially the association to GFAP.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseApolipoprotein E4BiomarkersCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesRisk FactorsApolipoprotein E4BiomarkersAlzheimer’s diseaseBlood-biomarkersPolygenic risk scores

Identifiers

PMID37516890
PMCPMC10386275

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.