Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37517990›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2023

Defining operational research priorities to improve malaria control and elimination in sub-Saharan Africa: results from a country-driven research prioritization setting process.

Roger Tine, Samantha Herrera, Mouhamed Ahmed Badji, Kyle Daniels, Pascal Ndiaye, Cara Smith Gueye, Fassiatou Tairou, Laurence Slutsker, Jimee Hwang, Evelyn Ansah and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Roger Tine *Université Cheikh Anta Diop, Dakar, Senegal.
Samantha Herrera *PMI Insights Project/PATH, Washington, DC, USA. sherrera@path.org.
Mouhamed Ahmed BadjiUniversité Cheikh Anta Diop, Dakar, Senegal.
Kyle DanielsPMI Insights Project/University of California, San Francisco Malaria Elimination Initiative, San Francisco, USA.
Pascal NdiayeMabouya Solutions, Brussels, Belgium.
Cara Smith GueyePMI Insights Project/University of California, San Francisco Malaria Elimination Initiative, San Francisco, USA.
Fassiatou TairouUniversité Cheikh Anta Diop, Dakar, Senegal.
Laurence SlutskerPMI Insights Project/PATH, Washington, DC, USA.
Jimee HwangU.S. President's Malaria Initiative, Malaria Branch, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Evelyn AnsahUniversity of Health and Allied Sciences, Accra, Ghana.
Megan LittrellPMI Insights Project/PATH, Washington, DC, USA.
Malaria Operational Research Prioritization Partnership
University of California, San Francisco · USCheikh Anta Diop University · SNClinical Insights · USUniversity of Health and Allied Sciences · GHCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn order to reignite gains and accelerate progress toward improved malaria control and elimination, policy, strategy, and operational decisions should be derived from high-quality evidence. The U.S. President's Malaria Initiative (PMI) Insights project together with the Université Cheikh Anta Diop of Dakar, Senegal, conducted a broad stakeholder consultation process to identify pressing evidence gaps in malaria control and elimination across sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), and developed a priority list of country-driven malaria operational research (OR) and programme evaluation (PE) topics to address these gaps.

methodsFive key stakeholder groups were engaged in the process: national malaria programmes (NMPs), research institutions in SSA, World Health Organization (WHO) representatives in SSA, international funding agencies, and global technical partners who support malaria programme implementation and research. Stakeholders were engaged through individual or small group interviews and an online survey, and asked about key operational challenges faced by NMPs, pressing evidence gaps in current strategy and implementation guidance, and priority OR and PE questions to address the challenges and gaps.

resultsAltogether, 47 interviews were conducted with 82 individuals, and through the online survey, input was provided by 46 global technical partners. A total of 33 emergent OR and PE topics were identified through the consultation process and were subsequently evaluated and prioritized by an external evaluation committee of experts from NMPs, research institutions, and the WHO. The resulting prioritized OR and PE topics predominantly focused on generating evidence needed to close gaps in intervention coverage, address persistent challenges faced by NMPs in the implementation of core strategic interventions, and inform the effective deployment of new tools.

conclusionThe prioritized research list is intended to serve as a key resource for informing OR and PE investments, thereby ensuring future investments focus on generating the evidence needed to strengthen national strategies and programme implementation and facilitating a more coordinated and impactful approach to malaria operational research.

Indexed as

MalariaOperations ResearchAfrica South of the SaharaHealth PolicyHumansSenegalMalaria controlMalaria eliminationResearch prioritizationSub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID37517990
PMCPMC10387205
OpenAlexW4385387939

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.