Evidence mapPaperPMID 37519214Full record

ArticleStatistical methods in medical research2023

Multiple imputation approaches for epoch-level accelerometer data in trials.

Mia S Tackney, Elizabeth Williamson, Derek G Cook, Elizabeth Limb, Tess Harris, James Carpenter

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistical methods in medical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Reliable measures of rest-activity rhythm fragmentation: how many days are needed?European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mia S TackneyDepartment of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3868-0550
Elizabeth WilliamsonDepartment of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6905-876X
Derek G CookPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, UK.
Elizabeth LimbPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, UK.
Tess HarrisPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, UK.
James CarpenterDepartment of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBSt George's, University of London · GB

Funding

The Role of Tuberculosis Disease on Non-Communicable Disease Risk: Comparative Analysis of Large Healthcare DatabasesR21AI156161 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Julia Alison Critchley, Matthew James Magee · 2022 to 2022
$132k
Medical Research Council MC_UU_00004/07Medical Research Council MR/R013489/1Medical Research Council MR/S01442X/1NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI156161Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical trials that investigate physical activity interventions often use accelerometers to measure step count at a very granular level, for example in 5-second epochs. Participants typically wear the accelerometer for a week-long period at baseline, and for one or more week-long follow-up periods after the intervention. The data is aggregated to provide daily or weekly step counts for the primary analysis. Missing data are common as participants may not wear the device as per protocol. Approaches to handling missing data in the literature have defined missingness on the day level using a threshold on daily weartime, which leads to loss of information on the time of day when data are missing. We propose an approach to identifying and classifying missingness at the finer epoch-level and present two approaches to handling missingness using multiple imputation. Firstly, we present a parametric approach which accounts for the number of missing epochs per day. Secondly, we describe a non-parametric approach where missing periods during the day are replaced by donor data from the same person where possible, or data from a different person who is matched on demographic and physical activity-related variables. Our simulation studies show that the non-parametric approach leads to estimates of the effect of treatment that are least biased while maintaining small standard errors. We illustrate the application of these different multiple imputation strategies to the analysis of the 2017 PACE-UP trial. The proposed framework is likely to be applicable to other digital health outcomes and to other wearable devices.

Indexed as

AccelerometryExerciseComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansaccelerometerMissing datamultiple imputationphysical activity trialwearables

Identifiers

PMID37519214
PMCPMC10563375
OpenAlexW4385407097

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.