Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37520992›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Transcription factors organize into functional groups on the linear genome and in 3D chromatin.

Rakesh Netha Vadnala, Sridhar Hannenhalli, Leelavati Narlikar, Rahul Siddharthan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rakesh Netha VadnalaThe Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Chennai, India.
Sridhar HannenhalliNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Leelavati NarlikarDepartment of Data Science, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune, India.
Rahul SiddharthanThe Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Chennai, India.
Homi Bhabha National Institute · INIndian Institute of Science Education and Research Pune · INNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcription factors (TFs) and their binding sites have evolved to interact cooperatively or competitively with each other. Here we examine in detail, across multiple cell lines, such cooperation or competition among TFs both in sequential and spatial proximity (using chromatin conformation capture assays), considering in vivo binding data as well as TF binding motifs in DNA. We ascertain significantly co-occurring ("attractive") or avoiding ("repulsive") TF pairs using robust randomized models that retain the essential characteristics of the experimental data. Across human cell lines TFs organize into two groups, with intra-group attraction and inter-group repulsion. This is true for both sequential and spatial proximity, and for both in vivo binding and sequence motifs. Attractive TF pairs exhibit significantly more physical interactions suggesting an underlying mechanism. The two TF groups differ significantly in their genomic and network properties, as well in their function-while one group regulates housekeeping function, the other potentially regulates lineage-specific functions, that are disrupted in cancer. Weaker binding sites tend to occur in spatially interacting regions of the genome. Our results suggest that a complex pattern of spatial cooperativity of TFs and chromatin has evolved with the genome to support housekeeping and lineage-specific functions.

Indexed as

ChromatinTranscription factors

Identifiers

PMID37520992
PMCPMC10382302
OpenAlexW4384565004

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.