Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2023
Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Two Empagliflozin Formulations in Healthy Korean Subjects.
Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiopulmonary Remodeling In Nondiabetic Patients with Systolic Heart Failure Using Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.Current cardiology reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Bioequivalence of Two Empagliflozin 25 mg Immediate-Release Tablet Formulations Under Fasting Conditions in Healthy Mexican Subjects.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Population Pharmacokinetic Study to Compare a Novel Empagliflozin L-Proline Formulation with Its Conventional Formulation in Healthy Subjects.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Empagliflozin is a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor that is commonly used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. As cocrystal formulation can improve the chemical properties of drugs, CKD-370 was newly developed as a cocrystal formulation of empagliflozin with solvate L-proline. This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of these two empagliflozin formulations in healthy Korean subjects. Methods: A randomized, open-label, two-sequence, two-period crossover study was conducted on healthy Korean participants. The subjects received a single oral 25 mg dose of either test (CKD-370) or reference treatment (Jardiance Results: A total of 28 healthy Korean adult subjects were randomized, and 27 subjects were included in the PK analysis. The mean ± standard deviation values of the primary PK parameters, C Conclusion: The two formulations of empagliflozin showed similar PK characteristics and were generally well tolerated in healthy subjects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.