Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37521294›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023

Effects of different transcranial magnetic stimulations on neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury.

Chuanmei Yang, Yunfeng Bi, Luoman Hu, Lili Gong, Zhanfei Li, Nanyang Zhang, Qiang Wang, Jiang Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chuanmei YangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Yunfeng BiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Luoman HuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Lili GongDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Zhanfei LiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Nanyang ZhangMedical Research Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Qiang WangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Jiang LiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Qingdao University · CNAffiliated Hospital of Qingdao University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an effective non-invasive cortical stimulation technique in the treatment of neuropathic pain. As a new rTMS technique, intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) is also effective at relieving pain. We aimed to establish the pain-relieving effectiveness of different modalities on neuropathic pain. The study was conducted in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) and different modalities of rTMS. Methods: Thirty-seven individuals with SCI were randomly allocated to three groups, in which the "iTBS" group received iTBS, the "rTMS" group received 10 Hz rTMS, and the "iTBS + rTMS" group received iTBS and 10 Hz rTMS successively of the primary motor cortex 5 days a week for 4 weeks, and they all underwent the full procedures. The primary outcome measure was change in the visual analog scale (VAS), and the secondary outcomes were measured using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). All the outcomes were evaluated at 1 day before stimulation (baseline), 1 day after the first week of stimulation (S1), and 1 day after the last stimulation (S2). Results: The VAS scores showed significant pain improvement after 4 weeks of stimulation ( Discussion: The primary and secondary outcomes all showed significant improvement, indicating that the three different modalities were all effective at relieving the pain. However, not all the three stimulations were of same effectiveness after treatment; there were statistical differences in the treatment of neuropathic pain between iTBS as a priming stimulus and as a single procedure.

Indexed as

intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS)neuropathic painnon-invasive stimulationrepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)spinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID37521294
PMCPMC10374342
OpenAlexW4384155898

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.