Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37521300›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2023

Identifying risk factors for in-stent restenosis in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ning Wang, Yuning Lu, Lei Feng, Dongdong Lin, Yuhai Gao, Jiong Wu, Ming Wang, Shu Wan

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Predictive Scoring Model for In-Stent Restenosis Risk in Coronary Artery Disease Patients.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ning Wang *Brain Center, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Yuning Lu *The Second Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Lei FengThe Second Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Dongdong LinBrain Center, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Yuhai GaoBrain Center, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Jiong WuBrain Center, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Ming WangBrain Center, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Shu WanBrain Center, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Zhejiang Hospital · CNZhejiang Chinese Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In-stent restenosis (ISR) is an adverse and notable event in the treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting (PTAS). The incidence and contributing factors have not been fully defined. This study was performed to evaluate factors associated with ISR after PTAS. Data source: We identified studies on ISR after PTAS from an electronic search of articles in PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Database (dated up to July 2022). Results: A total of 19 studies, including 452 cases of ISR after 2,047 PTAS, were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled incidence rate of in-stent restenosis was 22.08%. ISR was more likely to occur in patients with coronary artery disease (OR = 1.686; 95% CI: 1.242-2.288; Conclusions: The present study provides the current estimates of the robust effects of some risk factors for in-stent restenosis in intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. The Enterprise stent had advantages compared with the Wingspan stent for ISR. The significant risk factors for ISR were coronary artery disease, dissection, and high residual stenosis. Local anesthesia was a suspected factor associated with ISR.

Indexed as

in-stent restenosisintracranial atherosclerotic stenosismeta-analysispercutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stentingrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID37521300
PMCPMC10375724
OpenAlexW4384296223

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.