Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37521813›Full record

ArticleEmergency and critical care medicine2022

Comparison of the anxiety level between the medical staff and the public during the early phase of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

Guanguan Luo, Yumin Liu, Dongai Yao, Shaozhou Ni, Bangsheng Wu, Liting Lin, Yunming Wang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emergency and critical care medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 88% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Guanguan LuoEmergency Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Yumin LiuNeurology Department, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Dongai YaoHealth Examination Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Shaozhou NiEmergency Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Bangsheng WuSecond Clinical College of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Liting LinFirst Clinical College of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Yunming WangFirst Clinical College of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Wuhan University · CNZhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A sudden outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) started in December 2019 in Wuhan, China. Up-to-date, there have been limited studies examining the anxiety status of Chinese individuals in the early phase of the pandemic period (January 30, 2020-February 15, 2020). This survey aimed to compare the level of anxiety of the medical staff with that of the public and to provide a theoretical basis for developing an effective psychological intervention. Method: Questionnaires were sent on the Internet (http://www.wjx.cn) during this period. The anxiety levels of Chinese people were investigated using the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), and the demographic data were collected simultaneously. Results: A total of 1110 participants were enrolled in this study, with an effective response rate of 100%. A total of 482 respondents were medical staff (43.4%), while 628 were members of the general public (56.6%). The medical staff itself had a higher SAS score than the general public (48.36±13.40 Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on the anxiety levels of the medical staff and the public, with the medical personnel showing a higher anxiety level than the public, especially female medical staff in Wuhan. Therefore, urgent intervention programs to reduce anxiety should be implemented.

Indexed as

AnxietyCOVID-19Healthcare workersMental healthSelf-Rating Anxiety Scale

Identifiers

PMID37521813
PMCPMC9555553
OpenAlexW4292662075

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.